This list of fossil molluscs described in 2022 is a list of new taxa of fossilmolluscs that were described during the year 2022, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to molluscan paleontology that occurred in 2022.
A member of Trachyceratinae. The type species is C. compressum (Johnston, 1941); genus also includes new species C. crassum, and C. levicostatum. Announced in 2022; the final article version was published in 2023.
A member of the family Tornoceratidae. The type species is "Goniatites" paucistriatus d`Archiac & de Verneuil (1842); genus also includes "Tornoceras" rhysum Clarke (1898).
Mironenko & Naugolnykh (2022) describe a collection of cephalopod jaws from the Permian (Artinskian) Divjinskian Formation (Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia), interpreted as likely fossil material of goniatitid ammonites belonging to the genus Uraloceras, and infer from the anatomy of the studied jaws that representatives of the genus Uraloceras were likely active predators.[23]
A study on the morphological change through ontogeny of beyrichitine ammonites from the Anisian of Nevada is published by Bischof, Schlüter & Lehmann (2022).[24]
A study aiming to determine whether the environmental changes around the Triassic–Jurassic boundary influenced development of septal thickness in ammonites, as well aiming to determine the relation between septal thickness and paleolatitudinal occurrences, and whether ontogenetic septal thickness-trajectories reflected paleogeographic origin or phylogenetic relationships of ammonites, is published by Weber et al. (2022).[25]
A study on the hydrodynamic properties of shells of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic ammonites is published by Hebdon et al. (2022).[26]
A study on the functional morphology of ammonites from the Middle Triassic to the Early Jurassic, reevaluating possible causes of an overall shift of ammonite shell forms during the studied periods, is published by Hebdon et al. (2022), who interpret their findings as indicating that the trade-offs between coasting efficiency, volume accretion per unit surface area accreted and diameter accretion per unit of surface area (three factors proposed as explanations of the shift of shell forms) were identical in the Triassic and in the Jurassic.[27]
A study on changes of septal spacing between succeeding chambers of the shell of Gaudryceras tenuiliratum during its ontogeny is published by Kawakami, Uchiyama & Wani (2022).[29]
A study on the impact of the conch shape on ammonite locomotion, based on data obtained from tests of 3D-printed, biomimetic robots representing the oxycone morphology (based on Sphenodiscus lobatus and S. lenticularis), the serpenticone morphology (based on Dactylioceras commune), the sphaerocone morphology (based on Goniatites crenistria) and the morphospace center, is published by Peterman & Ritterbush (2022).[30]
A member of the family Trigonoceratidae. The type species is S. insalahensis; genus also includes new species S. felis and possibly also "Nautilus (Trematodiscus)" meekianus Winchell (1862) and "Nautilus (Trematodiscus)" strigatus Winchell (1862).
A member of the family Trigonoceratidae. The type species is T. peculiaris; genus also includes "Nautilus (Trematodiscus)" planidorsalis Winchell (1862).
A study on the identity of enigmatic black amorphous fossils often associated with belemnoid remains, based on the analysis of fossil material from the Upper Triassic (Carnian) Polzberg Lagerstätte (Austria), is published by Lukeneder & Lukeneder (2022), who interpret the enigmatic fossils as likely representing the preservation of a mineralized and secondarily carbonized cephalic-ocular-arm-cartilage complex of the belemnoid Phragmoteuthis bisinuata.[48]
A study on structures interpreted by Eduard Suess as beaks of Phragmoteuthis bisinuata is published by Doguzhaeva et al. (2022), who reinterpret the studied structures as cartilaginous remains of a prey, presumably juvenile fish; the authors also report a gladius of a previously unknown Carnian teuthid from the Cave del Predil (Italy), possibly similar to the Permian taxon Glochinomorpha stifeli, as well as an upper beak of a coleoid from the Anisian Buchenstein Formation (Italy), demonstrating typical coleoid upper beak morphology and composition, and interpreted by the authors as likely indicative of similar upper beak structure in P. bisinuata.[49] Their interpretation of purported beaks of P. bisinuata as remains of a prey is subsequently contested by Lukeneder & Lukeneder (2022).[50][51]
Belemnite species Liobelus acrei, otherwise known from the latest Jurassic and Early Cretaceous of the Boreal Realm, is reported from the Valanginian of the Vocontian Basin (France) by Mutterlose, Picollier & Dzyuba (2022), who interpret this finding as evidence of an isolated immigration of belemnites from the north in the early Valanginian, and establish two taxonomically different faunas of Tethyan belemnites.[52]
A study on the age of belemnites from the lower Santonian "Sponge horizon" of the Mozhzhelloovrazhnaya Formation in the Lower Volga region between Saratov and Volgograd (Russia), some of which are interpreted as redeposited from middle and upper Coniacian deposits on the basis of strontium, carbon and oxygen isotope data (with the first representatives of the genus Belemnitella interpreted as late Coniacian in age), is published by Zakharov et al. (2022).[53]
Revision of the type specimens of Eothinoceras americanum is published by Evans & Cichowolski (2022), who restrict the genus Eothinoceras to the type species, and propose a new scheme for classification of the genera belonging to the order Cyrtocerinida.[54]
A study on the distribution of nautiloids throughout the Cenozoic is published by Kiel, Goedert & Tsai (2022), who interpret their findings as indicating that from the Oligocene onward nautiloids became extinct in areas where pinnipeds appeared, while cetaceans (with possible exception of simocetids and agorophiids) were not found to significantly affect the demise of nautiloids.[55]
Fossil material of "Kummelonautilus" taiwanum is described from the Miocene Houdongkeng Formation (Taiwan) by Goedert, Kiel & Tsai (2022), who provisionally transfer this species to the genus Nautilus, and review the fossil record of the genus Nautilus in the Indo-Pacific region.[56]
A study on the external and internal morphology, affinities and ecology of Vampyronassa rhodanica, based on data on soft tissue of specimens from the La Voulte-sur-Rhône (France), is published by Rowe et al. (2022).[57]
First cephalopod statoliths from the Lower Cretaceous of Poland and United Kingdom are described by Pindakiewicz et al. (2022), who compare Mesozoic statoliths to those of extant cephalopods, and find the closest resemblance between Mesozoic forms and statoliths of extant idiosepiids.[58]
A study on the fossil material of Belosaepia from the Egemkapel Clay Member of the Tielt Formation and the Roubaix Clay Member of the Kortrijk Formation (Belgium), applying micro-CT imaging to the studied fossils, is published by Goolaerts et al. (2022), who identify growth lines in the studied fossils, and interpret their findings as indicating that the studied material belongs to representatives of a single species (B. tricarinata).[59]
A member of Cardiida belonging to the family Ferganoconchidae; a replacement name for Liaoningia Yu & Dong (1993). Ceccolini & Cianferoni (2021) proposed a replacement name Sinoliaoningia for the same genus in an earlier publication.[70]
A member of the family Vesicomyidae. The type species is "Archivesica" knapptonensis Amano & Kiel (2007); genus also includes "Archivesica" marincovichi Kiel & Amano (2010).
A member of Trigoniida belonging to the family Rutitrigoniidae. Genus includes new species W. neilpearti and W. ignota.
Bivalve research
Late Triassic bivalves are identified for the first time in olistostromes from the Sêwa Formation in the Riganpeicuo area (Tibet, China) by Xiao et al. (2022).[78]
A study on the impact of the Triassic–Jurassic extinction event on the body-size distribution of bivalves, based on data from three study sites in the United Kingdom, is published by Opazo & Twitchett (2022).[79]
Asato, Nakayama & Imai (2022) study color patterns of freshwater bivalves from the Lower Cretaceous Kitadani Formation (Japan), providing evidence of the presence of similar shell color patterns in extant and Early Cretaceous bivalves.[81]
A member of the family Eucyclidae. The type species is "Calliotropis" microglyptophorus Darragh (1997); genus also includes "Calliotropis" antarchais Stilwell (2005).
A member of the family Hydrobiidae. The type species is E. caeca; genus also includes new species E. angulata, E. minuta and E. striata, as well as "Hydrobia" enikalensis Kolesnikov (1935). Published online in 2023, but the issue date is listed as December 2022.[82]
A member of the family Luciellidae. The type species is E. buckhornensis; genus also includes "Trochus" hissingerianus de Koninck (1843), "Pleurotomaria" squamula Phillips (1836) and "Luciellina" ocultabanda Kues & Batten (2001).
A member of the family Clavatulidae. The type species is "Pleurotoma" granulato-cincta Münster in Goldfuss (1841); genus also includes new species G. callim, G. theoderichi and G. pelliscrocodili, as well as "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" angelae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Clavatula" contorta Švagrovský (1958), "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" nataliae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma" schreibersi Hörnes (1854), "Clavatula" calcarai Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" curionii Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" pellegrinii Simonelli (1896), "Pleurotoma" sotterii Michelotti (1847), "Clavatula" turbinata Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" turgidula Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" vigolensis Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" rugata Bellardi (1877), "Murex" rusticus Brocchi (1814), "Pleurotoma" capgrandi Tournouër (1873), "Pleurotoma" obtruta Millet (1865), "Clavatula" delgadoi Vera-Peláez & Lozano-Francisco (2001) and possibly "Clavatula" boreointerrupta Kautsky (1925).
A member of the family Clavatulidae. The type species is M. grunerti; genus also includes new species M. pilleri, as well as "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" amaliae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" antoniae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" evae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma" laevigatum Eichwald (1830), "Perrona" nemethi Kovács & Vicián (2021), "Pleurotoma" neudorfensis Schaffer (1898), "Pleurotoma tuberculosa" polonica Pusch (1837), "Pleurotoma (Clavatula) asperulata" var. subsculpta Schaffer (1912), "Pleurotoma" ernesti Toula (1901), "Pleurotoma" asperulata Lamarck (1822), Clavatula saubrigiana laurensii Peyrot (1931) and possibly "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" szontaghi Strausz (1926), "Clavatula" taurofusulata Sacco (1890), "Clavatula" subdepressa Sacco (1890) and "Clavatula" tortonica Peyrot (1931).
A member of the family Clavatulidae. The type species is "Perrona" harzhauseri Kovács & Vicián (2021); genus also includes new species N. zoltanorum, as well as "Clavatula" taurinensis Bellardi (1877).
Possibly a member of Cerithioidea. The type species is "Gymnocerithium" concavum Janicke (1966); genus also includes "Cerithium" amabile Zittel (1873), "Gymnocerithium"? convexoconcavum Gründel, Keupp & Lang (2019), "Cerithium" crenato-cinctum Zittel (1873), "Cerithium" involvens Zittel (1873) and "Cerithium" perrotundum Cossmann (1913).
A member of the family Clavatulidae. The type species is O. mandici; genus also includes "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" agathae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" brigittae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma" doderleini Hörnes (1854), "Pleurotoma (Clavatula)" dorotheae Hoernes & Auinger (1891), "Pleurotoma" rumana Simionescu & Barbu (1940), Clavatula schreibersi szokolyensis Strausz (1960), "Pleurotoma" winterlingensis Quenstedt (1884), "Clavatula" aradasi Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" baccifera Bellardi (1877), "Clavatula" consularis Bellardi (1877) and "Clavatula" stazzanensis Bellardi (1877). The original generic name was Olegia,[97] but this name turned out to be preoccupied by Olegia Shaposhnikov (1979), necessitating the creation of a replacement name.[96]
A member of the family Brachytrematidae. The type species is "Turbo" cotteausius d'Orbigny (1853); genus might also include "Turbo" greppini De Loriol in De Loriol & Koby (1895).
A member of the new family Neritidae. Genus includes Chinese species formerly assigned to the genus Mesoneritina ("M." crassa Pan, 1982, "M." dakangensis Pan, 1978, "M." gansuensis Yu & Guo, 1982, "M." nanshanensis Pan, 1984, "M." opima Yu, 1974, "M." pustula Pan, 1980), as well as new species P. ambrae from the Kachin amber.
A member of the family Hydrobiidae. Genus includes "Amnicola" cyclostomoides Sinzov (1880). Published online in 2023, but the issue date is listed as December 2022.[82]
A study on transitions from water to land throughout the evolutionary history of gastropods is published by Vermeij & Watson-Zink (2022).[133]
A study on changes in gastropod diversity at the genus/subgenus level from the Norian to the Pliensbachian is published by Ferrari & Hautmann (2022), who report that gastropods lost 56% of genera/subgenera during the Triassic–Jurassic extinction event, which was much more than the average loss of marine life at the time, and attempt to determine potential causes of the end-Triassic extinctions of gastropods.[134]
A study aiming to determine the drivers of diversification for European freshwater gastropods over the past 100 million years is published by Neubauer et al. (2022).[135]
A study aiming to determine the factors which caused the diversification of European freshwater gastropods in the Late Cretaceous is published by Neubauer & Harzhauser (2022).[136]
A member of Helcionelloida. Originally tentatively assigned to the genus Scenella, but subsequently made the type species of the separate genus Hensoniconus.[143]
Revision of the oldest known specimens of Jinonicella kolebabai from the Middle Ordovician strata of Ukraine and Belarus is published by Gubanov et al. (2022), who report the preservation of growth lines which were previously documented only in Silurian specimens.[144]
New information on the anatomy of Typhloesus wellsi is presented by Conway Morris & Caron (2022), who consider it plausible that Typhloesus was a pelagic mollusc with possible affinities with gastropods.[145]
^Marchesi, R.; Balini, M.; Jenks, J. F. (2022). "Early Carnian ammonoids from China Mountain (Tobin Range, Nevada, USA)". Palaeontographica Abteilung A. 325 (1–6): 69–109. doi:10.1127/pala/2022/0130. S2CID251449748.
^Ridente, D. (2022). "The 'grooved' Hildoceras ammonite fauna from the Lower Jurassic (Toarcian) of the Apennines. Overview and proposal for a new species". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (6): 941–957. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2071706. S2CID248928626.
^ abcdMönnig, E.; Dietl, G. (2022). "Die Ammoniten-Gattung Kepplerites in der obersten Herveyi- und der Koenigi-Zone (Unter-Callovium, Mittel-Jura) von Nord- und Süddeutschland". Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen. 95: 3–84.
^Delanoy, G.; Baudouin, C.; Pictet, A.; Moreno-Bedmar, J.; Frau, C.; Matrion, B. (2022). "The genera Roloboceras Casey, 1954, and Megatyloceras Humphrey, 1949 (Ammonoidea, Ancyloceratina, Douvilleiceratidae), from the Lower Aptian of Ardèche (SE France) - Taxonomic and biostratigraphic implications". Carnets de Géologie. 22 (2): 7–109. doi:10.2110/carnets.2022.2202. S2CID247397765.
^Gelin, G. R. J.-P. (2022). "Nejdia Arkell, 1952, an Early Jurassic (Toarcian) ammonite from the Marrat formation, Central Saudi Arabia". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 34 (10): 2053–2069. Bibcode:2022HBio...34.2053J. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.1999940. S2CID247433723.
^Mironenko, A. A.; Mitta, V. V. (2022). "The first record of jaws of Boreal Valanginian ammonites (Cephalopoda, Polyptychitidae)". Cretaceous Research. 142. 105370. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105370. S2CID252516602.
^Kawakami, Y.; Uchiyama, N.; Wani, R. (2022). "Ontogenetic trajectories of septal spacing and conch shape in the Late Cretaceous gaudryceratid ammonoids: implications for their post-embryonic palaeoecology". Palaeontology. 65 (1): 12587. Bibcode:2022Palgy..6512587K. doi:10.1111/pala.12587. S2CID246140718.
^Niko, S.; Ehiro, M. (2022). "Tohokubelus gen. nov., the Oldest Belemnite from the Olenekian (Lower Triassic) of Northeast Japan". Paleontological Research. 26 (2): 115–123. doi:10.2517/PR200036. S2CID247969661.
^Niko, S. (2022). "Reexamination of a Permian Tentaculites-Like Fossil Iwakiella ichiroi Hatai, Kotaka and Noda, 1972, as an Orthocerid Cephalopod". Paleontological Research. 26 (3): 229–232. doi:10.2517/PR200010. S2CID249141923.
^Zakharov, Y. D.; Kuznetsov, A. B.; Seltser, V. B.; Gavrilova, A. A.; Stativko, V. S.; Smyshlyaeva, O. P.; Kirienko, A. P.; Grigorev, V. E. (2022). "A 87Sr/86Sr, δ18O and δ13C record of Turonian-Santonian belemnites from Lower Volga region of the East European Platform: Stratigraphic significance and palaeoenvironmental reconstructions". Geobios. 74: 77–94. Bibcode:2022Geobi..74...77Z. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2022.07.006. S2CID251691251.
^Evans, D. H.; Cichowolski, M. (2022). "Revision of Eothinoceras and the status of the Eothinoceratidae (Cyrtocerinida, Multiceratoidea, Cephalopoda)". Journal of Paleontology. 97 (2): 347–354. doi:10.1017/jpa.2022.99. S2CID254319250.
^ abJagt, J. W. M.; Cooper, M. R.; Jagt-Yazykova, E. A. (2022). "The youngest Trigoniida (Mollusca, Bivalvia) of Europe, including new genera and species from the type area of the Maastrichtian Stage". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 306 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2022/1094. S2CID253317568.
^ abcdeBrunetti, M. M.; Della Bella, G. (2022). "La Famiglia Tellinidae Blainville, 1814, nel Plio-Pleistocene dell'Europa meridionale, parte 1, i generi Leporimetis Iredale, 1930, Arcopagia T. Brown, 1827, Arcopella Thiele, 1934, Gastrana Schumacher, 1817, Macoma Leach, 1819, Psammotreta Dall, 1900, con descrizione di 5 nuove specie e di una nuova sottospecie". Bollettino Malacologico. 58 (1): 18–46. doi:10.53559/BollMalacol.2021.22.
^Ceccolini, F.; Cianferoni, F. (2021). "Five replacement names for fossil bivalve genera (Mollusca: Bivalvia)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 302 (2): 231–234. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2021/1025. ISSN0077-7749. S2CID243903591.
^ abcdLutikov, O. A.; Arp, G. (2022). "Taxonomy and Biostratigraphic Significance of the Toarcian Bivalves of the Genus Meleagrinella Whitfield, 1885". Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation. 30 (supplement issue 1): S47 –S77. Bibcode:2022SGC....30S..47L. doi:10.1134/S0869593823010045. S2CID257605092.
^ abcBrunetti, M. M.; Della Bella, G. (2022). "La Famiglia Tellinidae Blainville, 1814, nel Plio-Pleistocene dell'Europa meridionale, parte seconda:i generi Asbjornsenia Friele, 1886, Strigilla W. Turton, 1822, Bosemprella M. Huber, Langleit & Kreipl, 2015, Fabulina Gray, 1851, Macomangulus Nordsieck, 1969, Oudardia Monterosato, 1884, Peronaea Poli, 1791, Peronidia Dall, 1900, Serratina Pallary, 1920, con descrizione di 3 nuove specie". Bollettino Malacologico. 58 (2): 94–120. doi:10.53559/BollMalacol.2022.10.
^Pérez, D. E.; Ferrari, M.; Ezcurra, M. D. (2022). "Phylogenetic analysis of the gastropod genus Calliotropis Seguenza, 1902 (Vetigastropoda: Calliotropidae), including fossil and living species". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 20 (1): Article 2100288. Bibcode:2022JSPal..20....1P. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2100288. S2CID251818530.
^Bichain, J.-M.; Jochum, A.; Pouillon, J.-M.; Neubauer, T. A. (2022). "Archaeocyclotus brevivillosus sp. nov., a new cyclophorid land snail (Gastropoda: Cyclophoroidea) from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber". Cretaceous Research. 140. 105359. Bibcode:2022CrRes.14005359B. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105359. S2CID252253356.
^ abBrook, F. J.; Hayward, B. W. (2022). "Taxonomy and taphonomy of Pliocene bulimoid land snails from Mangere, northern New Zealand, with descriptions of a new genus and two new species (Gastropoda: Bothriembryontidae: Placostylinae)". New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 65 (3): 491–506. Bibcode:2022NZJGG..65..491B. doi:10.1080/00288306.2022.2072904. S2CID249034879.
^Tomida, S.; Inoue, K.; Kase, T. (2022). "A new species of Astralium (Gastropoda: Turbinidae) from the Middle Miocene of the Izu Peninsula, central Japan". Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum. 49: 59–65. doi:10.50897/bmfm.49.0_59.
^ abcdeLandau, B.; Harzhauser, M. (2022). "The Pliocene Gastropoda (Mollusca) of Estepona, southern Spain. Part 14: Clavatulidae (Gastropoda, Conoidea)". Cainozoic Research. 22 (1): 45–72.
^ abcdefghGarvie, C.; Symonds, M. F. (2022). "New species of fossil Neritidae, Neridomidae, and Otostomidae (Gastropoda: Neritoidea) from Texas, Tennessee, and Alabama". The Nautilus. 136 (3–4): 37–48.
^ abcdefghGründel, R.; Hostettler, B.; Menkveld-Gfeller, U. (2022). "Gastropoden aus der Korallenrifffazies der St-Ursanne-Formation (mittleres Oxfordien) des Schweizer Jura. 3. Die Unterklasse Caenogastropoda Cox, 1960". Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève. 41 (1): 29–84. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6022757.
^Chaix, X.; Grenier, D. (2022). "Note sur une nouvelle espèce de Pleurotomariidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) du Campanien (Crétacé supérieur) de Charente". Fossiles. Revue française de paléontologie. 49: 41.
^Brunetti, M. M.; Della Bella, G. (2022). "Una nuova specie del genere Favartia Jousseaume, 1880 (Gastropoda, Muricidae) per il Pliocene italiano". Bollettino Malacologico. 58 (2): 121–125. doi:10.53559/BollMalacol.2022.12. S2CID253658959.
^ abYu, T.-T.; Páll-Gergely, B.; Salvador, R. B. (2022). "Caenogastropoda and Stylommatophora (Gastropoda) from the mid-Miocene Zhangpu amber of East Asia". Palaeoworld. 32 (4): 721–728. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2022.07.004. S2CID251170175.
^ abD. Merle; B. Garrigues; P. Pointier, eds. (2022). Fossil and Recent Muricidae of the World. Part Muricopsinae. ConchBooks. pp. 1–528. ISBN9783948603243.
^ abMiller, J. P.; Cruzado-Caballero, P.; de la Nuez, J.; Carrillo Pacheco, M.; Castillo Ruiz, C. (2022). "Review of the Middle Pleistocene molluscan association from La Mancha de la Laja, Tenerife, Spain, with the description of two new species of Napaeus Albers, 1850 (Gastropoda: Enidae)". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (8): 1308–1321. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2089982. S2CID250269782.
^ abcdefLandau, B. M.; Mulder, H. (2022). "Additions and corrections to the gastropod fauna of the Pliocene of Estepona, south-western Spain, 5". Basteria. Journal of the Netherlands Malacological Society. 86 (2): 153–173.
^Kadolsky, D.; Morton, A. (2022). "An unusual Nystia species (Gastropoda, Truncatelloidea) from the early Rupelian of the Isle of Wight (Hampshire Basin, England)". Cainozoic Research. 22 (1): 3–7.
^ abRaisossadat, S. N.; Guzhov, A.; Nazemi, R.; Motamedalshariati, M. (2022). "Gastropoda from Lower Cretaceous Deposits of Nimbolook Area, Eastern Iran". Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation. 30 (1): 65–74. Bibcode:2022SGC....30...65S. doi:10.1134/S0869593822010063. S2CID247413063.
^Salvador, R. B.; Yu, T. (2022). "Reassessment of Asian Mesoneritina spp. (Gastropoda, Neritidae), with the description of a new genus and species from middle Cretaceous amber of northern Myanmar". Cretaceous Research. 138: Article 105274. Bibcode:2022CrRes.13805274S. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105274.
^Karapunar, B.; Nützel, A.; Ketwetsuriya, C. (2022). "A low-diversity Peruvispira-dominated gastropod assemblage from the Permian Ratburi Group of Central Thailand". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 46 (2): 147–155. Bibcode:2022Alch...46..147K. doi:10.1080/03115518.2022.2050814. S2CID252311285.
^ abHoşgör, I.; Pacaud, J.-M. (2022). "New pareorine gastropod species from the Danian (Paleocene) of the Haymana-Polatlı Basin, Central Turkey". Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana. 61 (3): 279–287. doi:10.4435/BSPI.2022.05 (inactive 2024-11-20).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
^Roosen, M. (2022). "A new species of Trigonostoma (Gastropoda, Cancellariidae) from the Miocene (Upper Langhian to Serravallian) of Dingden, Germany". Cainozoic Research. 22 (2): 353–356.
^ abGroh, K.; Hutterer, R.; Ripken, T. E. J.; Neiber, M. T. (2022). "Description of two Tudorella species (Gastropoda: Sorbeoconcha: Pomatiidae) from the Early Pliocene of Fuerteventura (Canary Islands, Spain)". Archiv für Molluskenkunde. 151 (2): 75–84. doi:10.1127/arch.moll/151/075-084. S2CID255035903.
^Li, X.-F.; Li, G.-B.; Garvie, C. L. (2022). "Early Eocene Marine Microgastropods from the Zhupure Formation in Yadong, Southern Tibet, China". Palaeoworld. 33 (3): 777–787. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2022.12.011. S2CID255253893.
^Nützel, A.; Schweigert, G.; Karapunar, B. (2022). "The earliest gastropod with varices from the Mesozoic and the first record of decapod crustaceans from the St. Cassian Formation, Dolomites, Italy – a possible example of Triassic predator-prey interaction". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 305 (2): 153–160. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2022/1083. S2CID252130173.
^Vermeij, G. J.; Watson-Zink, V. M. (2022). "Terrestrialization in gastropods: lineages, ecological constraints and comparisons with other animals". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 136 (3): 393–404. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blac053.
^ abcMghazli, K.; Lazreq, N.; Geyer, G.; Landing, E.; Boumehdi, M. A.; Youbi, N. (2022). "Cambrian microfossils from the High Atlas, Morocco: Taxonomic, biostratigraphic, palaeobiogeographic, and depositional significance of the Brèche à Micmacca limestone beds". Journal of African Earth Sciences. 197. 104751. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104751. S2CID252860239.
^ abDell'Angelo, B.; Landau, B. M.; da Silva, C. M.; Sosso, M. (2022). "Biogeography of northeastern Atlantic Neogene chitons (Mollusca, Polyplacophora): New data from the Pliocene of Portugal". Journal of Paleontology. 96 (4): 814–838. Bibcode:2022JPal...96..814D. doi:10.1017/jpa.2022.1. S2CID247329004.
