Carbon pricing (or CO2 pricing) is a method for governments to address climate change, in which a monetary cost is applied to greenhouse gas emissions in order to encourage polluters to reduce the combustion of coal, oil and gas – the main driver of climate change. The method is widely agreed[1] to be an efficient policy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon pricing seeks to address the economic problem that emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases (GHG) are a negative externality – a detrimental product that is not charged for by any market.
Latest models of the social cost of carbon calculate a damage of more than $300/tCO2 as a result of economy feedbacks and falling global GDP growth rates, while policy recommendations range from about $50 to $200.[9][failed verification] Many carbon pricing schemes including the ETS in China remain below $10/tCO2.[5] One exception is the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) which exceeded €100/tCO2 ($108) in February 2023.[10]
A carbon tax is generally favoured on economic grounds for its simplicity and stability, while cap-and-trade theoretically offers the possibility to limit allowances to the remaining carbon budget. Current implementations are only designed to meet certain reduction targets.
Carbon pricing is considered by many economists to be the most efficient way to reduce emissions.[2] This means that it reduces emissions for the least possible cost, where these costs include the cost of efficiency measures as well as the cost of the inconvenience of making do with less of the goods and services provided by fossil fuels. This efficiency comes about by eliminating a market failure (the un-priced external costs of carbon emissions) at its source – by pricing these costs.[11]
Economics points out that since regulators would have an extremely hard time finding out the value that each emitter receives from emitting,[a] this efficient outcome is extremely unlikely if the regulator chooses who can emit and who cannot. This is why economics teaches that command and control regulation will not be efficient, and will be less efficient than a market mechanism, such as carbon pricing. In the words of the IPCC, "[renewable energy subsidies] are less efficient alternatives to carbon taxes and emissions trading for inducing mitigation" (section 3.8.1.2).[12]
In a cap-and-trade design, the market for permits automatically adjusts the carbon price to a level that insures that the cap is met.[13][14] The government establishes an emissions cap, for example 1000 tCO2 per year. Then it either gives the allowances to stakeholders, or auctions them off to the highest bidder. After the permits have been distributed, they can be traded privately. Emitters without the required allowances face a penalty that would cost more than buying permits. If the cap is low, permits will be in short supply (scarcity) and the price of permits will be high.
The EU ETS uses this method. In practice it resulted in a fairly strong carbon price from 2005 to 2009, but that was later undermined by an oversupply as well as by the Great Recession. Recent policy changes have led to a steep increase of the carbon price since 2018, exceeding 100€/tCO2 ($118) in February 2023.[10]
Cap-and-trade systems can include price stability provisions with floor and ceiling limits.[22] Such designs are often referred to as hybrid designs.[12]: 47 To the extent the price is controlled by these limits, it can be considered a tax.
Carbon tax versus emissions trade
Carbon emissions trading works by setting a quantitative limit on the emissions produced by emitters. As a result, the price automatically adjusts to this target. This is the main advantage compared to a fixed carbon tax. A carbon tax is considered easier to enforce on a broad-base scale than cap-and-trade programs. The simplicity and immediacy of a carbon tax has been proven effective in British Columbia, Canada – enacted and implemented in five months.[23] A hybrid cap-and-trade program puts a limit on price increases and, in some cases, sets a floor price as well. The upper limit is set by adding more allowances to the market at a set price while the floor price is maintained by not allowing sales into the market at a price below the floor.[24] The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, for example, sets an upper limit on allowance prices through its cost containment provision.
However, industries may successfully lobby to exempt themselves from a carbon tax. It is therefore argued that with emissions trading, polluters have an incentive to cut emissions, but if they are exempted from a carbon tax, they have no incentive to cut emissions.[25] On the other hand, freely distributing emission permits could potentially lead to corrupt behaviour.[26]
Most cap and trade programs have a descending cap, usually a fixed percentage every year, which gives certainty to the market and guarantees that emissions will decline over time. With a tax, there can be estimates of reduction in carbon emissions, which may not be sufficient to change the course of climate change. A declining cap gives allowance for firm reduction targets and a system for measuring when targets are met. It also allows for flexibility, unlike rigid taxes.[23] Providing emission permits (also called allowances) under emissions trading is preferred in situations where a more accurate target level of emissions certainty is needed.[27]
Revenue policies
Standard proposals for using carbon revenues include
a return to the public on a per-capita basis[28] This can compensate the risk of rising energy prices reaching high levels as long as cheap wind and solar power is not available yet. Rich people who tend to have a larger carbon footprint would pay more while poorer people can even benefit from such a regulation.
subsidies accelerating the transition to renewable energy
research, public transport, car sharing and other policies that promote carbon neutrality
subsidies for negative emissions: Depending on the technology, such as PyCCS or BECCS, the cost for generating negative emissions is about $150–165 per ton of CO2.[29] The removal past emissions – 1,700 Gt in total[30] – can theoretically be addressed by auctioning allowances starting with a price that exceeds the removal costs of the proposed emissions.
The exact monetary damage caused by a tonne of CO2 depends on climate and economic feedback effects and remains to some degree uncertain. Latest calculations show an increasing trend. Dynamic models include discount rates. This results in lower costs in the current state and higher costs once that carbon budgets are used up.
About one third of the systems stays below $10/tCO2, the majority is below $40. One exception is the steep incline in the EU-ETS reaching $60 in September 2021. Sweden and Switzerland are the only countries with more than $100/tCO2.
Market price surge in fossil fuels
Unexpected spikes in natural gas prices and commodities such as oil and coal in 2021 caused a debate whether a carbon price increase should be postponed to avoid additional social burden. On the other hand, a redistribution on a per-capita-basis would even release poorer households which tend to consume less energy compared to wealthier parts of the population. The higher the high carbon price the greater the relief. Looking at individual situations though, the compensation would not apply to commuters in rural areas or people living in houses with poor insulation. They neither have liquidity to invest into solutions using less fossil fuels and would be dependent on credits or subsidies. On the other hand, a carbon price still helps to provide an incentive to use more effective fossil fuel technologies such as CCGT gas turbines in contrast to high-emission coal.[34]
Scope and coverage
In the relevant countries with ETS and taxes, about 40% to 80% of emissions are covered.[35] The schemes differ much in detail. They include or exclude fuels, transport, heating, agriculture or other greenhouse gases apart from CO2 like methane or fluorinated gases.[36] In many EU member states like France or Germany, there is a coexistence of two systems: The EU-ETS covers power generation and large industry emissions while national ETS or taxes put a different price on petrol, natural gas and oil for private consumption.
Carbon pricing schemes with more than $2 bn revenue
The final consumer price for fuels and electric energy depends on individual tax regulations and conditions in each country. Though carbon pricing is playing an increasing role, energy taxes, VAT, utility expenses and other components are still the main cause for completely different price levels between countries.
Impact on retail prices
The table gives examples for a carbon price of $100 or 100 units of any other currency accordingly. Food calculation is all based on CO2 equivalents including the high impact of methane emissions.
Many economic properties of carbon pricing hold regardless of whether carbon is priced with a cap or a tax. However, there are a few important differences. Cap-based prices are more volatile and so they are riskier for investors, consumers and for governments that auction permits. Also, caps tend to short-out the effect of non-price policies such as renewables subsidies, while carbon taxes do not.
Carbon leakage
Carbon leakage is the effect that regulation of emissions in one country/sector has on the emissions in other countries/sectors that are not subject to the same regulation.[49] There is no consensus over the magnitude of long-term carbon leakage.[50]
The leakage rate is defined as the increase in CO2 emissions outside the countries taking domestic mitigation action, divided by the reduction in emissions of countries taking domestic mitigation action. Accordingly, a leakage rate greater than 100% means that actions to reduce emissions within countries had the effect of increasing emissions in other countries to a greater extent, i.e., domestic mitigation action had actually led to an increase in global emissions.
Estimates of leakage rates for action under the Kyoto Protocol ranged from 5% to 20% as a result of a loss in price competitiveness, but these leakage rates were considered very uncertain.[49] For energy-intensive industries, the beneficial effects of Annex I actions through technological development were considered possibly substantial. However, this beneficial effect had not been reliably quantified. On the empirical evidence they assessed, Barker et al. (2007) concluded that the competitive losses of then-current mitigation actions, e.g., the EU-ETS, were not significant.
Under the EU ETS rules Carbon Leakage Exposure Factor is used to determine the volumes of free allocation of emission permits to industrial installations.
A general perception among developing countries is that discussion of climate change in trade negotiations could lead to green protectionism by high-income countries[51]Eco-tariffs on imports ("virtual carbon") consistent with a carbon price of $50 per ton of CO2 could be significant for developing countries. In 2010, World Bank commented that introducing border tariffs could lead to a proliferation of trade measures where the competitive playing field is viewed as being uneven. Tariffs could also be a burden on low-income countries that have contributed very little to the problem of climate change.
Interactions with renewable energy policies
Cap-and-trade and carbon taxes interact differently with non-price policies such as renewable energy subsidies. The IPCC explains this as follows:
A carbon tax can have an additive environmental effect to policies such as subsidies for the supply of RE. By contrast, if a cap-and-trade system has a binding cap (sufficiently stringent to affect emission-related decisions), then other policies such as RE subsidies have no further impact on reducing emissions within the time period that the cap applies [emphasis added].[52]: 29
Carbon pricing and economic growth
According to a 2020 study carbon prices have not harmed economic growth in wealthy industrialized democracies.[53]
In order for such a business model to become attractive, the subsidies would therefore have to exceed this value. Here, a technology openness could be the best choice, as a reduction in costs due to technical progress can be expected. Already today, these costs of generating negative emissions are below the costs[clarification needed] of CO2 of $220 per ton,[54] which means that a state-subsidized business model for creating negative emissions already makes economic sense today.[citation needed] In sum, while a carbon price has the potential to reduce future emissions, a carbon subsidy has the potential to reduce past emissions.[clarification needed]
In late 2013, William Nordhaus, president of the American Economic Association, published The Climate Casino,[55] which culminates in a description of an international "carbon price regime". Such a regime would require national commitments to a carbon price, but not to a specific policy. Carbon taxes, caps, and hybrid schemes could all be used to satisfy such a commitment. At the same time Martin Weitzman, a leading climate economist at Harvard, published a theoretical study arguing that such a regime would make it far easier to reach an international agreement, while a focus on national targets would continue to make it nearly impossible.[56] Nordhaus also makes this argument, but less formally.
Similar views have previously been discussed by Joseph Stiglitz[57] and have previously appeared in a number of papers.[58] The price-commitment view appears to have gained major support from independent positions taken by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).[59]
The "Economists' Statement on Climate Change"[60] was signed by over 2500 economists including nine Nobel Laureates in 1997. This statement summarizes the economic case for carbon pricing as follows:
The most efficient approach to slowing climate change is through market-based policies. In order for the world to achieve its climatic objectives at minimum cost, a cooperative approach among nations is required – such as an international emissions trading agreement. The United States and other nations can most efficiently implement their climate policies through market mechanisms, such as carbon taxes or the auction of emissions permits.
This statement argues that carbon pricing is a "market mechanism" in contrast to renewable subsidies or direct regulation of individual sources of carbon emissions and hence is the way that the "United States and other nations can most efficiently implement their climate policies."
A new quantity commitment approach, suggested by Mutsuyoshi Nishimura, is for all countries to commit to the same global emission target.[64] The "assembly of governments" would issue permits in the amount of the global target and all upstream fossil-fuel providers would be forced to buy these permits.
The economics of carbon pricing is much the same for taxes and cap-and-trade. Both prices are efficient;[b] they have the same social cost and the same effect on profits if permits are auctioned. However, some economists argue that caps prevent non-price policies, such as renewable energy subsidies, from reducing carbon emissions, while carbon taxes do not. Others argue that an enforced cap is the only way to guarantee that carbon emissions will actually be reduced; a carbon tax will not prevent those who can afford to do so from continuing to generate emissions.
Besides cap and trade, emission trading can refer to project-based programs, also referred to as a credit or offset programs. Such programs can sell credits for emission reductions provided by approved projects. Generally there is an additionality[66] requirement that states that they must reduce emissions more than is required by pre-existing regulation. An example of such a program is the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol. These credits can be traded to other facilities where they can be used for compliance with a cap-and-trade program.[67] Unfortunately the concept of additionality is difficult to define and monitor, with the result that some companies purposefully increased emissions in order to get paid to eliminate them.[68]
Cap-and-trade programs often allow "banking" of permits. This means that permits can be saved and can be used in the future.[citation needed] This allows an entity to over-comply in early periods in anticipation of higher carbon prices in subsequent years.[69] This helps to stabilize the price of permits.[13]
^Bashmakov, I.; et al. (2001). "6.2.2.2.1 Collection Point and Tax Base". In B. Metz; et al. (eds.). Policies, Measures, and Instruments. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Print version: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, N.Y., U.S.A.. This version: GRID-Arendal website. Archived from the original on December 28, 2013. Retrieved April 8, 2011.
^ abBeinecke, Frances; Sachs, Jeffrey D.; Krupp, Fred; Pielke Jr., Roger A.; Stavins, Robert N.; Komanoff, Charles; Claussen, Eileen; Fischhoff, Baruch (May 7, 2009). "Putting a Price on Carbon: An Emissions Cap or a Tax? by". Yale Environment 360. Archived from the original on August 2, 2010. Retrieved August 6, 2010.
^"Carbon Pricing 101". Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original on September 24, 2019. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
^Tamiotti, Ludivine; Teh, Robert; Kulaçoğlu, Vesile; Olhoff, Anne; Simmons, Benjamin; UNEP; World Trade Organization, eds. (2009). Trade and climate change: a report by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Trade Organization. Geneva: World Trade Organization. ISBN978-92-870-3522-6.
^Ackva, Johannes; Hoppe, Janna. "The carbon tax in Sweden"(PDF). German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) / adelphi. Archived(PDF) from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
^ abBarker, T.; et al. (2007). "Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective". In B. Metz; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved April 5, 2010.
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada Desember 2023. Mark BowenInformasi pribadiNama lengkap Mark BowenTanggal lahir 7 Desember 1963 (umur 60)Tempat lahir Neath, WalesPosisi bermain BekKarier senior*Tahun Tim Tampil (Gol)1983-1987 Tottenham Hotspur 1987-1996 Norwich City 1996-1997 West Ham United 1997…
Kerajaan SisiliaRegnu di Sicilia1130–1816 Bendera Lambang Ibu kotaPalermoAgama Katolik RomaPemerintahanMonarkiRaja • 1130-1154 Roger II• 1759-1816 Ferdinand III Sejarah • Didirikan 1130• Terbagi 1282 1816• Pembubaran 1816 Didahului oleh Digantikan oleh County Sisilia krjKerajaan Dua Sisilia krjKerajaan Naples Sunting kotak info • Lihat • BicaraBantuan penggunaan templat ini Kerajaan Sisilia (bahasa Latin: Regnum Siciliae atau Sicil…
Artikel ini bukan mengenai Utopia. Sebuah tanda lesbian dari dua simbol astronomis Venusyang saling bertalian. Utopia lesbian merujuk pada sebuah komunitas konseptual yang terdiri dari sepenuhnya wanita yang tidak tergantung apa pun pada pria.[1][2] Konsep mengenai masyarakat yang semua perempuan disebutkan dalam mitologi Yunani melalui sebuah legenda para Amazon, sebuah bangsa yang terdiri dari semua prajurit wanita. Dalam legenda ini, setahun sekali para Amazon mengajak para Ga…
APRA Music AwardsPenghargaan terkini: APRA Music Awards 2018NegaraAustraliaDipersembahkan olehAustralasian Performing Right Association (APRA)Diberikan perdana1982Situs webapraamcos.com.au/awards/ APRA Music Awards adalah beberapa acara penghargaan yang diadakan di Australia oleh Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) untuk menghargai keterampilan penulisan lagu dan komposisi, penjualan dan pemutaran penampilan oleh para anggotanya setiap tahun. Penghargaan tersebut diberikan untuk men…
Kutukan Bangsa Titan PengarangRick RiordanNegaraAmerika SerikatBahasaBahasa IndonesiaSeriPercy Jackson & Dewa-Dewi Olympia (Buku 3)GenreFantasi, fiksi, mitologi YunaniPenerbitMiramax dan Hyperion Books for Children (Amerika Serikat)Mizan (Indonesia)Tanggal terbit1 Mei 2007 (Amerika Serikat)Juni 2009 (Indonesia)Halaman412ISBNISBN 9789794335881 Invalid ISBNDidahului olehLautan Monster Diikuti olehPertempuran Labirin Kutukan Bangsa Titan adalah buku ketiga da…
Australian steam locomotive class WAGR O classO218 at the Western Australian Rail Transport MuseumType and originPower typeSteamBuilderDübs & CoNeilson & CoMidland Railway WorkshopsBuild date1896-1912Total produced56SpecificationsConfiguration: • Whyte2-8-0Gauge3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm)Driver dia.3 ft 0 in (914 mm)Length47 ft 4 in (14.43 m)Total weight62 long tons 17 cwt (140,800 lb or 63.9 t)Fuel …
Aguk akhir abad ke-17, bergambar kepala Raja Charles I (memerintah 1625–1649) Aguk adalah liontin yang terbuka untuk memperlihatkan ruang yang digunakan untuk menyimpan foto atau benda kecil lainnya seperti seikat rambut. Aguk biasanya diberikan kepada orang yang dicintai pada hari libur seperti Hari Valentine dan acara-acara seperti pembaptisan, pernikahan dan, yang paling penting selama Zaman Victoria, pemakaman . Secara historis, mereka sering dibuka untuk memperlihatkan miniatur potret . A…
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada November 2022. B. Andoeska (lahir 11 Februari 1948) adalah seorang komponis lagu Indonesia. Ia adalah spesialis pencipta lagu-lagu pesanan dari Bupati dan Wali kota. Ia mempunyai suku Tanjung. Orang tuanya bernama Syamsudin dan Saima. Oleh orang tuanya, ia diberi nama …
Dalam artikel ini, nama keluarganya adalah Ong. Betty OngBetty Ann OngNama asal鄧月薇LahirBetty Ann Ong(1956-02-05)5 Februari 1956San Francisco, California, ASMeninggal11 September 2001(2001-09-11) (umur 45)Kota New York, New York, ASSebab meninggalKecelakaan pesawat terorisPekerjaanPramugariDikenal atasMengabarkan pembajakan Penerbangan 11 kepada staf American Airlines Betty Ong Hanzi tradisional: 鄧月薇 Hanzi sederhana: 邓月薇 Alih aksara Mandarin - Hanyu Pinyin: Dèng …
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada November 2022. Bronisław DardzińskiLahir(1901-12-30)30 Desember 1901St. Petersburg, Kekaisaran Rusia (kini Rusia)Meninggal13 Mei 1971(1971-05-13) (umur 69)Warsawa, Republik Rakyat PolandiaPekerjaanPemeranTahun aktif1938–1966 Bronisław Dardziński (30 Des…
Kumlinge kommun Lambang Letak Provinsi Åland Kawasan Åland Subkawasan kepulauan Wilayah- Daratan- Urutan 96,59 km²96,28 km²urutan ke-409 Penduduk- Kepadatan- Perubahan- Urutan 371 (2004)3,9 jiwa/km²- 4,1%urutan ke-426 Pengangguran 6,9% Bahasa resmi Swedia Manajer kotamadya Jim Eriksson Situs resmi http://www.kumlinge.aland.fi/ Diarsipkan 2006-08-13 di Wayback Machine. Kumlinge ialah kotamadya pulau Åland, wilayah otonomi Finlandia. Kotamadya ini memiliki penduduk 371 (2004) dan mencakup wi…
AdolphePotret Adolphe karya Ludwig AngererAdipati NassauBerkuasa1839–1866PendahuluWilhelm, Adipati NassauPenerustidak ada (Nassau dianeksasi Prusia)Haryapatih LuksemburgBerkuasa1890–1905PendahuluWillem IIIPenerusGuillaume IVInformasi pribadiKelahiran(1817-07-24)24 Juli 1817Istana Biebrich, BayernKematian17 November 1905(1905-11-17) (umur 88)Puri HohenburgPemakamanWeilburgWangsaWangsa Nassau-WeilburgAyahWilhelm, Adipati NassauIbuPutri Louise dari Saxe-HildburghausenPasanganElizaveta Mikh…
Painting by František Kupka Katedrala, František Kupka, 1912–13 The Cathedral (Katedrála) is an abstract painting created by Czech artist František Kupka in 1912–13. The medium is oil on canvas, and the painting’s dimensions are 180 × 150 cm. The painting is a part of the permanent Jan and Meda Mládek collection of Museum Kampa in Prague, Czech Republic. This painting is one of a series of abstract works that Kupka termed Vertical and Diagonal Planes. Vertical lines, running the…
1 Raja-raja 11Kitab Raja-raja (Kitab 1 & 2 Raja-raja) lengkap pada Kodeks Leningrad, dibuat tahun 1008.KitabKitab 1 Raja-rajaKategoriNevi'imBagian Alkitab KristenPerjanjian LamaUrutan dalamKitab Kristen11← pasal 10 pasal 12 → 1 Raja-raja 11 (atau I Raja-raja 11, disingkat 1Raj 11) adalah bagian dari Kitab 1 Raja-raja dalam Alkitab Ibrani dan Perjanjian Lama di Alkitab Kristen. Dalam Alkitab Ibrani termasuk Nabi-nabi Awal atau Nevi'im Rishonim [נביאים ראשונים] dalam b…
Ini adalah nama Batak Angkola, marganya adalah Siregar. Arwin Siregar Wakil Wali Kota Padangsidimpuan ke-3PetahanaMulai menjabat 28 September 2018PresidenJoko WidodoGubernurEdy RahmayadiWali KotaIrsan Efendi Nasution PendahuluM. Isnandar NasutionPenggantiPetahana Informasi pribadiLahir12 Oktober 1957 (umur 66)Sipenggeng, Sumatera UtaraSuami/istriLinda Lovinasari HutasuhutAnak1Alma materUniversitas Sumatera UtaraSunting kotak info • L • B Ir. H. Arwin Siregar, M.M. (lah…
Amsal 10Kitab Amsal lengkap pada Kodeks Leningrad, dibuat tahun 1008.KitabKitab AmsalKategoriKetuvimBagian Alkitab KristenPerjanjian LamaUrutan dalamKitab Kristen20← pasal 9 pasal 11 → Amsal 10 (disingkat Ams 10) adalah bagian dari Kitab Amsal dalam Alkitab Ibrani dan Perjanjian Lama di Alkitab Kristen.[1][2] Teks Naskah sumber utama: Masoretik, Septuaginta dan Naskah Laut Mati. Pasal ini terdiri dari 32 ayat. Berisi amsal-amsal raja Salomo bin Daud.[3] Strukt…
Samudra Paleo-Tethys sekitar 280 juta tahun yang lalu. Paleo-Tethys atau Samudra Palaeo-Tethys adalah samudra yang terletak di batas utara Protogondwana yang mulai terbentuk pada masa Kambrium pertengahan, meluas pada masa Paleozoikum, dan pada akhirnya menutup pada masa Trias akhir, sehingga samudra ini pernah ada di Bumi selama 400 juta tahun.[1] Paleo-Tethys merupakan pendahulu Samudra Tethys (juga disebut Neo-Tethys). Samudra ini terbentuk setelah Samudra Proto-Tethys mengalami subdu…
Former Japanese amusement park Yokohama DreamlandLocationTotsuka-ku, YokohamaCoordinates35°22′59″N 139°29′43″E / 35.382976°N 139.495372°E / 35.382976; 139.495372StatusDefunctOpenedAugust 1, 1964 (1964-08-01)ClosedFebruary 17, 2002 (2002-02-17)OwnerDaiei (former Nippon Dream Kanko)Operated byDreamparkGeneral managerKunizo Matsuo The former Hotel Empire building, now the academic library of the Yokohama College of Pharmacy. Yokohama…