These proposed biozones Seeley named were subdivided further by Robert Broom between 1906 and 1909.[7]Broom proposed the following biozones (from oldest to youngest):
These biozone divisions were approved by paleontologists of the time and were left largely unchanged for several decades.[8] The Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone was first coined by Robert Broom in 1906,[9] where Broom referred to the rock layers Cistecephalusfossils were found in as the "Kistecephalus beds". The biozone was originally assigned to a far more broader stratigraphic range between the uppermost occurrence of Endothiodon and the lowermost of Lystrosaurus.[10] Decades later, James Kitching revised the biostratigraphic ranges of the Beaufort Group.[11][12] Kitching observed that Cistecephalusfossils were most abundant in a narrow band at the very top of the biozone. He named this area the "Cistecephalus acme zone" or "Cistecephalus Band". Later, researchers sought to redefine the biozone again as Cistecephalus fossils are extremely rare apart from the uppermost portion.[13] It was suggested that, due to the biozone containing the first appearance of Aulacephalodon and its fossils being found throughout, the biozone should be renamed to the Aulacephalodon Assemblage Zone. The biozone was then, for a brief time, renamed the Aulacephalodon-Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone.[14] However, due to the biozone first being named after Cistecephalus, the initial nomenclature of the biozone later overruled its renaming on historical grounds.[15][16]
Lithology
The Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone is located in the lower portion of the Teekloof Formation west of 24°E, in the upper Middleton Formation and lower Balfour Formation east of 24°E. These formations all fall within the Adelaide Subgroup of the Beaufort Group, sediments of which were formed in a large retroarcforeland basin in southwestern Gondwana.[17] The sedimentary rocks are mainly sandstone, mudrock layers containing mudstone, siltstone, and fine sandstone. The sandstones are thought to have been deposited in broad alluvial plains where low-sinuosity streams flowed, while the mudrock accumulated on the floodplains that flanked these streams.[18][19]
The majority of the fossils in the biozone are found in these interchannel mudrock layers as animal remains that came to rest on the floodplains were quickly buried by alluvial sediments washed downstream. Articulated fossils are not commonly found. However, isolated skulls are fairly common and are usually found encased in calcareousnodules.[20] Fossils not encased in nodules are often fragmented. In addition, Jurassic-aged dolerite sheet and dikeintrusions into the Beaufort Group[21][22] have affected the uniformity in colour and texture of the biozone rocks in areas. This includes the colour of the fossilized bones, which range from a smooth, white appearance to being nearly black depending on their proximity to the doleriteintrusions.
^Kammerer, C. (2008, September). A new therocephalian from the Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone of South Africa and new information on therocephalian systematics. In Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 98A-99A). 60 REVERE DR, STE 500, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 USA: SOC VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY.
^Watson, D. M. S. (September 1913). "II.—The Beaufort Beds of the Karroo System of South Africa". Geological Magazine. 10 (9): 388–393. doi:10.1017/S0016756800127219. ISSN1469-5081.
^Kitching, J. W. (1970). A short review of the Beaufort zoning in South Africa. In Second Gondwana Symposium Proceedings and Papers (Vol. 1, pp. 309–312).
^Keyser, A. W., & Smith, R. M. H. (1978). Vertebrate biozonation of the Beaufort Group with special reference to the western Karoo Basin. Geological Survey, Department of Mineral And Energy Affairs, Republic of South Africa.
^Keyser, A. W. (1979). A review of the biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group in the Karoo Basin of South Africa. Geocongress, Geological Society of South Africa, 2, 13–31.
^Kitching, J. W. (1984). A reassessment of the biozonation of the Beaufort Group. Paleo News, 4(1), 12–13.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Smith, R.M.H. (1995-08-01). "Changing fluvial environments across the Permian-Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin, South Africa and possible causes of tetrapod extinctions". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 117 (1–2): 81–104. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(94)00119-S. ISSN0031-0182.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^NICOLAS, MERRILL; RUBIDGE, BRUCE S. (March 2010). "Changes in Permo-Triassic terrestrial tetrapod ecological representation in the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup) of South Africa". Lethaia. 43 (1): 45–59. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00171.x. ISSN0024-1164.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Hancox, P.J; Rubidge, B.S (2001-01-01). "Breakthroughs in the biodiversity, biogeography, biostratigraphy, and basin analysis of the Beaufort group". Journal of African Earth Sciences. 33 (3–4): 563–577. doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(01)00081-1. ISSN1464-343X.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Sidor, Christian A.; Smith, Roger M. H. (2007-06-01). "A second burnetiamorph therapsid from the Permian Teekloof Formation of South Africa and its associated fauna". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 27 (2): 420–430. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[420:ASBTFT]2.0.CO;2. ISSN0272-4634.
^Kammerer, C. (2008, September). A new therocephalian from the Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone of South Africa and new information on therocephalian systematics. In Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 98A-99A). 60 REVERE DR, STE 500, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 USA: SOC VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Damiani, Ross J. (2004-01-01). "Temnospondyls from the Beaufort Group (Karoo Basin) of South Africa and Their Biostratigraphy". Gondwana Research. 7 (1): 165–173. doi:10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70315-4. ISSN1342-937X.
^Nasterlack, Tobias; Canoville, Aurore; Chinsamy, Anusuya (2012-11-01). "New Insights into the Biology of the Permian Genus Cistecephalus (Therapsida, Dicynodontia)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 32 (6): 1396–1410. doi:10.1080/02724634.2012.697410. ISSN0272-4634. S2CID86333197.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Dias da Silva, Sérgio (2011-03-01). "Middle-Late Permian tetrapods from the Rio do Rasto Formation, Southern Brazil: a biostratigraphic reassessment". Lethaia. 45 (1): 109–120. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2011.00263.x. ISSN0024-1164.
^Kammerer, Christian F.; Bandyopadhyay, Saswati; Ray, Sanghamitra (2016-10-03). "A new taxon of cistecephalid dicynodont from the upper Permian Kundaram Formation of India". Papers in Palaeontology. 2 (4): 569–584. doi:10.1002/spp2.1055. ISSN2056-2802.