Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Deforestation in Myanmar

Black and white photograph of logging in Myanmar taken by a Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation official during British rule.

Deforestation in Myanmar (otherwise known as Burma) led to a reduction in forest cover from 70% of the country in 1948 to 48% by 2014.[1][2] Myanmar possesses the largest expanse of tropical forest in mainland Southeast Asia, which contains high biodiversity.[3] As of 2010, Myanmar's living forest biomass held 1,654 million metric tons of carbon and over 80 endemic species.[2]

Under British rule, Myanmar's forests were logged for timber on an industrial scale for the first time. After independence, commercial logging greatly expanded under the military government of Ne Win. According to a report by the Food and Agriculture Organization, Myanmar lost 19%, or 7,445,000 hectares (28,750 sq mi), of its forest between 1990 and 2010.[4] In the 21st century, contributing factors to deforestation in Myanmar include continued timber extraction, illegal logging, agricultural expansion, land disputes and civil conflict. Deforestation has increased amidst the escalation of civil war following the 2021 coup d'état.

History

Colonial era

A work elephant moving logs during the colonial era.

Although the traditional agricultural practice of swiddening has been practised in Burma for thousands of years, there are no signs that it led to significant deforestation and may in fact have helped maintain the forests.[3] Significant deforestation in Burma began in the 1800s during the colonial era as the British cut down large expanses of forest for timber, a resource in high demand for their empire.[1][5] Hardwoods were very important to the British for shipbuilding, especially teak which was valued for its durability and water resistant properties.[5]

Following the annexation of Lower Burma in 1856, the British colonial government established the Forest Department in an effort to establish a sustainable system for logging. Coming mainly from Pegu Range of central Burma, logs would be pulled by elephants to rivers and then floated downstream to sawmills. The imperial demand for timber established logging as the main source of revenue for British Burma. Right before World War II, British Burma peaked logging operations, producing 447,000 tons of timber.[1]

Post-independence

Hardwood logs near Mandalay.

After independence in 1948, ethnic uprisings and civil unrest pushed aside both conservation and logging efforts. Insurgent groups holding control of the majority of Burma's forested regions made it increasingly dangerous for the Forest Department and the State Timber Board (the government's organisation in charge of teak extraction) to carry out operations.[5]

State logging activities recommenced with vigor, however, after the establishment of General Ne Win's military regime in 1962. The government, under military rule and the Burma Socialist Programme Party, claimed control of the forests and supported a State Timber Board nearly seven times larger than the 1952 establishment. The growth of the State Timber Board represents a growing importance of timber exports. While teak exports represented only 4% of total exports in 1952, by the late 1980s they accounted for up to 42%.[5] As a result, over 120,000 square kilometres (46,000 sq mi) of forest cover were lost between the late 1960s and the late 1980s. Forest cover decreased from about 70% at the time of independence to 46% in the late 1980s.[1][3]

The 1988 uprising and formation of the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) changed little in terms of the state's policy on deforestation. In 1989, the Burmese state made deals with 42 Thai logging companies to log within the Thai-Burmese border resulting in the deforestation over up to 18,000 square kilometres (7,000 sq mi).[5] In 1992 the SLORC passed a new Forest Law that, for the first time, put emphasis on environmental conservation and in 1993 shut down the Thai logging deals. Despite the new law, unregulated logging operations and exports continue to threaten the hardwood forests and continue the pace of deforestation.[1]

The deforestation rate of Myanmar declined from 0.95% per year in the years 1990–2010 to about 0.3% per year, making Myanmar's rate lower than other countries of the region such as Indonesia or Vietnam.[6] Despite the diversity and size of Burma's forests, only 6.3% of the land was protected and much of remained under the threat of deforestation.[7] Three main factors contributed to continued deforestation by this stage; unsustainable and illegal logging, unresolved land rights and land disputes and extensive agricultural development.[8]

Following political liberalisation during the 2010s, Myanmar's forest department and more than 45 non-governmental organizations and civil society groups began working to address deforestation and land tenure issues. These efforts were curtailed after the military seized power in the 2021 coup d'état.[9] After the coup, illegal logging, mining and forest product exports all increased amidst the escalation of civil war. Conservation efforts by civil society groups were curtailed by the conflict. Timber exports are the responsibility of the Myanma Timber Enterprise and raise funds for the military government.[9]

Causes

Economic development

Burma's regime of totalitarian socialism, lasting until 1988, left the country economically stunted and one of the world's most impoverished countries.[10] Recent efforts to integrate back into the international economy have led to an influx of state development projects, many of which exploit Burma's natural resources and forests. International development groups such as the World Bank have emphasised across Southeast Asia the role of forests as fuel for economic growth.[11]

While international pressure and support for economic development has increased, the technique of forest conversion has been employed in Burma since the colonial era. Burma and many other Southeast Asian states have encouraged the conversion of forested land into rice paddies, rubber plantations, teak plantations, or other exportable crops.[11] Many rural Burmese depend on the forest for resources such as firewood, charcoal, and farm materials.[12]

Illegal logging

Due to the size and scope of Burma's forests, it is difficult for government organisations like Forest Department to regulate logging. There is a high demand for timber from Myanmar's neighbours–notably Thailand and China–who have depleted their forests much more than Myanmar.[13] As a result, numerous illegal logging operations have sprung up near the Thai-Burmese border and in the province of Kachin along the Chinese border. Logs are commonly cut on the Burmese side and then smuggled to processing facilities in China or Thailand.[13]

Lack of regulations has led to unbridled and destructive logging that has caused environmental damage such as soil erosion, river contamination, and increased flooding.[14] In Kachin State, which has some of the largest expanses of relatively untouched forest, illegal logging accounts for up to half of the deforestation.[14] Due to the remoteness of these regions and the international demand for hardwoods, illegal logging is a threat that is hard to address and will probably continue contributing to deforestation. A major problem is that illegal logging is still classified in Myanmar as an environmental matter, and not as a criminal act, making it difficult for the Forest Department to bring a lawsuit against the offenders.[8]

Agricultural expansion

Agricultural land has expanded across Myanmar since independence.[15] Even though large areas of forest are not commonly cleared for agriculture, logged areas can quickly become agricultural as people take advantage of the space to plant crops.[15]

War and conflict

Long-term internal conflict in Myanmar has facilitated the conditions for deforestation to take place. Satellite imaging of the conflict in Rakhine State suggested significant deforestation corresponded with military demolition of inhabited areas.[16] Since the restoration of military rule and escalation of civil war following the 2021 coup d'état, illegal logging has increased as conservation activities have declined.[9][17] Forest product exports from Myanmar to several European countries and the United States continued following the military takeover, despite international sanctions.[9][18]

Affected regions

Caleb did this.
Fishing boats on the Ayeyarwady River.

In the years from 1990 to 2000, the greatest amount of deforestation in Burma occurred mainly in the more densely populated central regions of the country. More remote areas such as Kachin State, Chin State, and Tanintharyi Division had a lower rate of deforestation probably due to a smaller population demand and less state control.[6] In the 2010s, deforestation hotspots have arisen in areas that have previously been spared, namely in Kachin State, Tanintharyi Division and Sagaing Region.[19]

The northern edge of the central dry zone and Ayeyarwady valley is significantly affected by deforestation. Mainly a result of agricultural expansion, over 7% of this land had been deforested by 2005. This has led to many environmental concerns as the dry forests of this region support many diverse and vulnerable flora and fauna that rely on this habitat.[6]

Ayeyarwady Delta

The Ayeyarwady Delta Region was the most threatened region, experiencing an average annual deforestation rate of 1.2% from 1990 to 2000, a rate four times the national average.[6] The Ayeyarwady Region has a population of over 8 million people and is a large agricultural centre, accounting for about 35% of the country's rice production. As a result of agricultural expansion and the use of wood for fuel, mangrove cover declined 64.2% from 1978 to 2011 and continues to disappear. Home to some of the most diverse mangrove forests, this deforestation has significant repercussions both economically and environmentally. Mangroves provide protection from tropical cyclones, seasonal flooding, and are crucial for the fishing industry that is an important livelihood for much of the coast.[7]

Tanintharyi Region

In 1999, the ruling military junta, the State Peace and Development Council, initiated the large-scale development of such plantations, especially in Tanintharyi Region, the southernmost region of Myanmar.[20] As of 2019, over 401,814 ha of palm oil concessions have been awarded to 44 companies.[20] 60% of the awarded concessions consist of forests and native vegetation, and some concessions overlap with national parks, including Tanintharyi and Lenya National Parks, which have seen significant deforestation and threaten conservation efforts for endemic species like the Indochinese tiger.[20][21]

Mangrove forests

Mangroves in Myanmar

Mangrove deforestation in Myanmar is usually for commercial uses or resources extraction, and is occurring mainly in 3 different regions: Rakhine State, Ayeyarwady Mega Delta, and Tanintharyi Division. While large areas of mangrove forests remain, the deforestation rates of these forests have been increasing due to anthropogenic influences such as economic pressures to overexploit and expand the aquaculture and agricultural industry. There are also natural threats that contribute to mangrove deforestation such as soil erosion. There has been recent increased attention to conserve and restore these forests through rehabilitation projects and policies.

These mangrove forests are important to the country’s economy, climate and biodiversity. The Burmese people, especially the rural communities are heavily dependent on the resources from the mangrove forests for a living. Mangrove forests also help ameliorate negative impacts from natural disasters and are home to many different types of flora and fauna that thrive specifically in these ecosystems.

Conservation

The longest standing forestry conservation practice in Burma is the traditional practice of swidden agriculture. The slash and burn techniques of forest inhabitants, the majority of whom are tribal minorities, are often blamed for causing deforestation. This practice, rather than being destructive, can be shown to cause regeneration of the forest if they are given enough space.[3] One of the first systems of forestry management imposed by the Burmese government was the Burma Selection System (BSS), started during British colonial rule in the late 1800s. The BSS became a world-renowned system and was the basis for a sustainable forestry in Southeast Asia.[22]

Now called the Myanmar Selection System (MSS), this technique is still used today, primarily for the management of natural teak forests.[23] The MSS divides a forest into 30 equal plots, which are each put on a 30-year felling cycle. When a block is due for harvest, trees larger than a certain diameter are cut until allowable volume is removed.[23] When a tree is cut, they are pulled out through the traditional use of elephants rather than large machines, which are harmful to the soil.[12] The MSS is a sustainable approach to logging that allows forests to restore themselves and does not deplete large swaths of land.

See also

Regional:

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Seekins, Donald (21 August 2006). Historical Dictionary of Burma (Myanmar). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 0810854767.
  2. ^ a b "Myanmar Forest Information and Data". mongabay.com. Archived from the original on 4 May 2014. Retrieved 2 May 2014.
  3. ^ a b c d Bernard, Stéphane; Rodolphe De Koninck (1996). "The Retreat of the Forest in Southeast Asia: A Cartographic Assessment". Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 17 (1): 1–14. Bibcode:1996SJTG...17....1B. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.1996.tb00080.x.
  4. ^ "Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Country Report: Myanmar" (PDF). Forestry Department of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
  5. ^ a b c d e Bryant, Raymond (1996). The Political Ecology of Forestry in Burma. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Press.
  6. ^ a b c d Leimgruber, Peter; Daniel S. Kelly; Marc K. Steininger; Jake Brunner; Thomas Müller; Melissa Songer (September 2005). "Forest cover change patterns in Myanmar (Burma) 1990−2000". Environmental Conservation. 34 (4): 356–364. Bibcode:2005EnvCo..32..356L. doi:10.1017/S0376892905002493. S2CID 53709874.
  7. ^ a b Webb, Edward; Nicholas Jachowski; Jacob Phelps; Daniel Friess; Maung Maung Than; Alan Ziegler (January 2014). "Deforestation in the Ayeyarwady Delta and the conservation implications of an internationally-engaged Myanmar". Global Environmental Change. 24: 321–333. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.007.
  8. ^ a b Stokke, Kristian; Vakulchuk, Roman and Indra Overland (2018) Myanmar: A Political Economy Analysis Archived 28 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI). Report commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  9. ^ a b c d "Myanmar's forests fall victim to conflict". Nikkei Asia. 14 September 2023. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
  10. ^ Tallentire, Mark (28 September 2007). "The Burma road to ruin". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  11. ^ a b Peluso, Nancy; Peter Vandergeest; Lesley Potter (March 1995). "Social Aspects of Forestry in Southeast Asia: A Review of Postwar Trends in the Scholarly Literature". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 26 (1): 196–218. doi:10.1017/s0022463400010584.
  12. ^ a b Mon, Myat Su; Nobuya Mizoue; Naing Zaw Htun; Tsuyoshi Kajisa; Shigejiro Yoshida (2012). "Factors affecting deforestation and forest degradation in selectively logged production forest: A case study in Myanmar". Forest Ecology and Management. 267: 190–198. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.036.
  13. ^ a b Talbott, Kirk; Melissa Brown (1998). "Forest Plunder in Southeast Asia: An Environmental Security Nexus in Burma and Cambodia". Environmental Change and Security Project Report (4): 53–60. PMID 12321720.
  14. ^ a b Brunner, Jake; Kirk Talbott; Chantal Elkin (August 1998). Logging Burma's Frontier Forests: Resources and the Regime. World Resources Institute.
  15. ^ a b Hill, R.D. (1998). "Stasis and Change in Forty Years of Southeast Asian Agriculture". Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 19 (1): 1–25. Bibcode:1998SJTG...19....1H. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.1998.tb00247.x.
  16. ^ Aung, Thiri Shwesin (August 2021). "Satellite analysis of the environmental impacts of armed-conflict in Rakhine, Myanmar". Science of the Total Environment. 781: 146758. Bibcode:2021ScTEn.78146758A. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146758. ISSN 0048-9697.
  17. ^ Frontier (17 April 2022). "'Quick profits': Activists fear for environment under military rule". Frontier Myanmar. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  18. ^ "U.S. traders flouting sanctions on buying Myanmar teak, report says". Mongabay Environmental News. 22 May 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  19. ^ Bhagwat, Tejas; Andrea Hess; et al. (2017). "Losing a jewel—Rapid declines in Myanmar's intact forests from 2002-2014". PLOS ONE. 12 (5): e0176364. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1276364B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176364. PMC 5435175. PMID 28520726.
  20. ^ a b c Nomura, Keiko; Mitchard, Edward T. A.; Patenaude, Genevieve; Bastide, Joan; Oswald, Patrick; Nwe, Thazin (15 August 2019). "Oil palm concessions in southern Myanmar consist mostly of unconverted forest". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 11931. Bibcode:2019NatSR...911931N. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48443-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6695397. PMID 31417153.
  21. ^ "Myanmar risks losing forests to oil palm, but there's time to pivot". Mongabay Environmental News. 13 November 2019. Archived from the original on 10 June 2023. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
  22. ^ Kevin, Woods; Kerstin Canby (September 2012). "Forest Certification in Myanmar". Forest Information Trends Brief. 3.
  23. ^ a b Dah, Saw Eh (2004). "Teak and Forest Management in Myanmar". ITTO Tropical Forest Update.
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya