Draft:Bush Blocks Guardians
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Dan arndt 4 years ago.
|
Comment: Still fails WP:NORG, the significant coverage needs to be about the organisation not the issue that the organisation is attempting to address. Noting the organisation was formed in 2021 and the sources are from the 1990s. Dan arndt (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment: Fails WP:NORG, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Bush Blocks Guardians Inc. is a Western Australian non-profit organisation which aims to expand the nature reserve system in the region's central wheatbelt. Around 95%[1][2][3]of this region has been cleared[4]of its original vegetation and it has no large secure reserves such as national parks or wilderness areas.
The group purchases land using donations and then revegetates the cleared areas using local occurring species, endeavouring to bring the cleared areas back to their original state, which will then hopefully encourage the return of other missing flora and fauna.
External links
Category:Non-profit organisations based in Western Australia Category:Nature conservation organisations based in Australia
References
- ^ Burvill, G. (1956-01-01). "Land clearing control in the Eastern Wheatbelt". Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 3. 5 (1): 77–80. ISSN 0021-8618.
- ^ Hobbs, Richard J. (1993). "Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australian wheatbelt". Biological Conservation. 64 (3): 193–201. Bibcode:1993BCons..64..193H. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90321-q. ISSN 0006-3207.
- ^ Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2012-03-01). "Little left to lose: deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization". Journal of Plant Ecology. 5 (1): 109–120. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtr038. ISSN 1752-9921.
- ^ Hobbs, R. J.; Saunders, D. A.; Main, A. R. (1993), "Conservation Management in Fragmented Systems", Reintegrating Fragmented Landscapes, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 279–296, doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9214-9_10, ISBN 978-1-4613-9216-3, retrieved 2021-11-04
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.