Submission declined on 20 May 2026 by GreenRedFlag (talk). Please see below: 1) Insufficient independent secondary coverage to establish notability 2) Promotional tone 3) Over reliance on primary sources 4) Lack of encyclopedic tone 5) Seems original research If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by GreenRedFlag 2 months ago. Last edited by Semorra 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 5 May 2026 by RangersRus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Declined by RangersRus 3 months ago.

This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing it from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve this article by replacing such sources with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent sources. (May 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Driventic is a German manufacturer headquartered in Heidenheim an der Brenz, specializing in drive technologies for commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, and off-highway applications.

Driventic was spun off from the commercial vehicle division of Voith Turbo in November 2025, as an independent company with around 1400 employees in 18 countries^[1][2][3]. This is according to the strategy that Voith is checking to sale the commerical vehicle devision^[4]. Meanwhile, the works council was elected as a part of the spin-off process ^[5].

Driventic provides thechnical solutions and components for buses, trucks and off-highway vehicles using products including Electric Drive Systems (former Voith Electrical Drive System ^[*]), automatic transmissions (former Voith DIWA), retarders, retarder clutch, air compressor, vibration damper and exhaust heat recovery solutions^[6].

An electric drive axle introduced in ACT EXPO 2026 in Las Vegas based on a cooperation with Hendrikson^[7][8], which is itself rooted in the previously confirmed sterategic partnership between Voith and Hendrikson in April 2025^[9][10].

Factories are sited in Garching, Shanghai^[1] and St. Georgen am Steinfelde ^[11][12].

According to the solutions found for specific technical problems, there are some active patents and scientific articles in review and published such as performance, noise and vibration analysis ^[13]

• ^* VEDS (Voith Electrical Drive System) is renamed to Driventic VEDS.

• Drivetrain
• Fluid coupling
• Voith turbo transmission
• Voith DIWA