Submission declined on 10 May 2026 by Nixleovel (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Nixleovel 3 months ago. Last edited by Nixleovel 3 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 27 February 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Pythoncoder 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 4 February 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement. You must place an inline citation directly after: quotations; any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious; any material about living people. Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the: Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup. VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor. Declined by ChrysGalley 6 months ago.

• Comment: This draft relies on routine "hire/fire" announcements and primary-source interviews, which do not satisfy the significant coverage requirements. Specifically, the Ad Age and Politico sources are routine business news that offer no biographical analysis, while the Digiday piece is an interview where the subject is the one speaking, making it a primary rather than an independent source. To establish notability, the article needs at least three independent, secondary sources, such as deep-dive profiles or industry reports, where journalists provide their own analysis of the subject's career. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 19:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article.

• Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article.

• Comment: See WP:42 and what we need is three lots of that. So newspaper profiles, but not interviews (the interview is not independent). At the moment we have 2 interviews, some comments in passing and press releases off The Guardian. The tone is also promotional, more akin to a LinkedIn profile, with possibly the dread hand of LLM in some parts. This is an encyclopedia, dry and crisp summary rather than a résumé. It's actually quite hard for media business folk to get articles, journos hate writing about them on the whole, and when PR companies get involved it all ends up as an interview. Either way, some more work is needed here. ChrysGalley (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article.

Eamonn Store is a British-American media executive. He was the CEO of The Guardian US, the North American operation of Guardian News & Media, from 2014 to 2017.^[1] His appointment was reported by Ad Age and Politico in 2014.^[2]

Store was born in Southampton, England. He attended the Worth Abbey School in West Sussex.

In 2014, Store was appointed as the CEO of The Guardian US, the North American business of Guardian News & Media.^[1] His appointment was covered by Politico as part of reporting on leadership changes at the organization.^[2]

In 2016, Politico Europe reported on restructuring and staffing reductions affecting the Guardian's US news operation.^[3]

Store was also interviewed by industry publication Digiday about editorial positioning and audience strategy in the United States.^[4]

He stepped down from the role in 2017.

Store lives between New York and London.