Draft:Hacking the Spaces
Submission declined on 30 June 2026 by Helpful Raccoon (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Comment: Filled with symptoms of LLM usage such as WP:OVERATTRIBUTION and WP:AITREND. Please remove all text from the draft and start over from a blank slate without LLMs. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
| This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Helpful Raccoon (talk | contribs) 49 days ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? |
Hacking the Spaces is a 2009 critical pamphlet by Austrian artist and theorist Johannes Grenzfurthner and German writer Frank Apunkt Schneider about the history, politics, and institutionalization of hackerspaces and hacklabs. Published online by the Austrian art and theory group monochrom, the text examined hackerspaces as social and technical infrastructures while criticizing what the authors saw as a shift away from countercultural, micropolitical, and oppositional traditions toward a more commodified and entrepreneurial maker culture.[1]
The pamphlet has been cited in scholarship on hackerspaces, maker culture, fab labs, open-technology communities, and design justice, especially in discussions of the political history of hacklabs and hackerspaces, the depoliticization of hacker culture, and questions of gender, race, and exclusion within hacker and maker communities.[2][3][4]
Background and publication
Hacking the Spaces was published online by monochrom in 2009 under the subtitle "A critical acclaim of what was, is and could be a hackerspace (or hacklab, for that matter)".[1] The text appeared amid growing public visibility of hackerspaces, makerspaces, fab labs, and related community workshops devoted to computing, electronics, digital fabrication, and technical experimentation.[4]
The pamphlet situated hackerspaces in a longer countercultural history of shared spaces, alternative infrastructures, and experiments in collective living and working. It connected the history of hackerspaces to earlier forms of social and technical experimentation, including hacklabs, squats, and politically oriented media and technology spaces.[1]
Argument
Grenzfurthner and Schneider argued that hackerspaces could not be understood only as neutral workshops or technical clubs. They described them as social spaces shaped by class, gender, race, subcultural codes, and broader political-economic conditions.[1]
The pamphlet criticized what the authors described as a drift from oppositional hacker traditions toward more domesticated forms of geek culture and technological hobbyism. It argued that hackerspaces risked becoming compatible with entrepreneurial self-optimization, the ideology of the "creative class", and urban innovation policy, rather than remaining connected to dissent, illegality, improvisation, and political critique.[2]
The text also addressed exclusion within hacker and maker communities. Grenzfurthner and Schneider criticized what they called "white male nerd dominance" in hackerspaces and argued for a broader, non-repressive inclusion of groups marginalized by bourgeois society.[1] This phrase was later cited in education and maker-culture scholarship as part of a critique of the demographics and cultural codes of hacker, tinkerer, and robotics communities.[4]
Reception and influence
Sasha Costanza-Chock discussed Hacking the Spaces in Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need, placing it within a history of hacklabs, hackerspaces, fab labs, hackathons, and other "design sites". Costanza-Chock discusses the pamphlet as part of a broader account of the transformation of hacklabs and hackerspaces from politicized spaces linked to social movements into sites increasingly shaped by start-up culture, neoliberal ideas of individual technical mastery, and municipal innovation policy.[2]
Christina Dunbar-Hester discussed the pamphlet in Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. In her account of the 2012 Hackers on Planet Earth conference,[5] The panel description characterized Hacking the Spaces as having provoked controversy in forums and mailing lists after its publication. Dunbar-Hester notes that the panel referenced the 2009 pamphlet and connected its arguments to debates about diversity, inclusion, counterculture, punk, squatting, do-it-yourself practices, and the political history of hackerspaces.[3] A contemporary comment piece in The Guardian reported on the panel and situated it within a broader debate about gender and participation in hackspaces and computer science.[6]
The pamphlet was also taken up in debates about the political direction of hacklabs and hackerspaces.
Maxigas discussed Grenzfurthner and Schneider's pamphlet in an account of the differing political genealogies of hacklabs and hackerspaces, contrasting more explicitly activist hacklab traditions with the later institutionalization of hackerspaces.[7]
Alex Megelas, writing on hackerspaces and social movements, cited Hacking the Spaces as an argument for linking hacker communities to broader social change. Megelas described the pamphlet as criticizing the complacency and largely homogeneous makeup of hacker culture while calling for a more politicized understanding of hackerspaces.[8]
The pamphlet has also been cited in scholarship on education and making. Erica Rosenfeld Halverson and Kimberly M. Sheridan cited Grenzfurthner and Schneider's phrase "white male nerd dominance" in their discussion of critiques of the maker movement in education.[4] The Studio XX text "Hacking with Care" quoted the same passage in a discussion of exclusion, care, politics, and well-being in hacktivist environments.[9]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e Grenzfurthner, Johannes; Schneider, Frank Apunkt (2009). "Hacking the Spaces". monochrom. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
- ^ a b c Costanza-Chock, Sasha (2020). "Design Sites: Hackerspaces, Fablabs, Hackathons, and DiscoTechs". Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press. ISBN 9780262043458. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
- ^ a b Dunbar-Hester, Christina (2020). Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. Princeton University Press. pp. 59–62. ISBN 9780691182070.
- ^ a b c d Halverson, Erica Rosenfeld; Sheridan, Kimberly M. (2014). "The Maker Movement in Education". Harvard Educational Review. 84 (4): 495–504. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.
- ^ "HOPE Number Nine: Hacking the Spaces". YouTube. Hackers on Planet Earth. 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
- ^ Grossman, Wendy M. (18 July 2012). "Computer science: still a male domain?". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
- ^ Maxigas (2012). "Hacklabs and Hackerspaces: Tracing Two Genealogies". Journal of Peer Production (2). Retrieved 31 May 2026.
- ^ Megelas, Alex (28 June 2016). Movement Hacking: Hackerspaces and Social Movements. e-artexte. ISBN 978-2-920306-44-8. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
- ^ "Hacking with Care: Attention, bien-être et politique de l'ordinaire dans le milieu hacktiviste". .dpi. Studio XX. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
See the advice page on large language models for more information.