Submission declined on 23 April 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by ChrysGalley 3 months ago. Last edited by ChrysGalley 3 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: A crypto company with barely a year of trading is highly unlikely to meet the requirement for corporate depth, it's borderline Reject territory. See WP:SIRS and the two sections below on corporate depth and corporate trivia. One source, coindesk, should not be used at all, it's not reliable. Funding/unicorn is totally corporate trivia, which just leaves Stabledash. In content it's heading towards corporate depth, but the source is at best a promotional platform, it's some way from being the Financial Times or Wall Street Journal. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. JWStorry (talk) 09:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

KAST is a financial services technology company. It was founded in 2024 by Raagulan Pathy, a former executive at Circle. The company develops financial services using stablecoins. It has been described as a “stablecoin neobank” by industry publications.^[1].

The company offers consumer and business financial services using stablecoins, including payments and cross-border transactions.

In January 2025, KAST raised an initial $10 million seed round at a valuation that was described as approximately $100 million^[2].

In March 2026, the company raised an $80 million Series A funding round^[3]. The funding was reported to support expansion, hiring, licensing and product development^[4]. At the time of the raise it was reported that KAST has more than 1 million users and processes $5 billion annualised transaction volumes^[5]