Submission declined on 18 January 2026 by CNMall41 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by CNMall41 6 months ago. Last edited by Colorado001 13 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 27 October 2025 by MCE89 (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MCE89 9 months ago.

LearningRO

Type of site	Educational
Available in	English
Founder	Dhumik Pravin
URL	LearningRO.com
Launched	January 25, 2025; 18 months ago (2025-01-25)

LearningRO is an educational technology platform founded in 2025.^[1][2] It provides AI-assisted tutoring and digital revision tools for students in the United Kingdom.^[3]

LearningRO originated as a college coursework project for the Pearson BTEC Level 3 National Diploma in Business. Developed at Gateway College, the platform was created by Dhumik Pravin as part of Unit 19 Pitching for a New Business.^[4] The assignment required students to develop and pitch a micro-business concept, modeled after the Dragons' Den television format. Initially launched on 25 January 2025 under the name 'LearnifyX', the project was later rebranded to LearningRO.^[5][6][7][8]

RoTutor is an AI-assisted chatbot integrated into the LearningRO platform.^[9] It provides structured guidance for academic subjects such as science, mathematics, English, and business. The chatbot includes step-by-step explanations, and built-in study tools, such as a note system, timer, and goal tracker. The chatbot uses a points-based system for user avatars.^[10]

The platform includes accessibility tools designed for students with disabilities. It is designed to support students who prefer or require technology-based learning environments.^[11][12]

The platform provides resources for various educational levels, including GCSEs, BTECs, and A-levels. Subject areas include science, mathematics, business studies, and geography.^[13][14]

LearningRO also includes a category dedicated to cultural and festival education. This section provides information on the historical and social background of festivals celebrated in India and other regions. This includes 'The Great Builders of India' project, a series covering historical figures such as freedom fighters, rishis and sants. The project focuses on connecting historical figures and contemporary values for younger learners^[15]

• Educational technology
• Artificial intelligence in education