Submission declined on 21 May 2026 by MSK (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by MSK 2 months ago. Last edited by MSK 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 14 May 2026 by Tacyarg (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for web content. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Tacyarg 2 months ago.

• Comment: 11 of the references are to the site itself, and the rest appear to be passing mentions. Tacyarg (talk) 23:31, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Nintendo World Report is an American English-language video game website focused on Nintendo platforms, games, news, reviews, podcasts, and video coverage. The site is listed as a video game review outlet by review aggregators including Metacritic and OpenCritic.^[1][2]

Nintendo World Report was founded by Billy Berghammer. In 2008, Wired identified Berghammer as the site's founder and described him as a former Game Informer editor during its coverage of the site's podcast Radio Free Nintendo.^[3] The site's video channel describes Nintendo World Report as Nintendo enthusiast coverage active since 1999.^[4]

Nintendo World Report publishes Nintendo-focused reviews and commentary. Its reviews are included in Metacritic's critic database,^[1] while OpenCritic lists the outlet's review history, average review score, and recommendation percentage.^[2] Switch Scores also maintains a profile for the site in its Nintendo Switch review database.^[5]

The site has also been cited or included in coverage by Nintendo-focused publications outside the English-language press.^{[6][7][8][9][10]}

Radio Free Nintendo is the site's long-running podcast. Apple Podcasts lists it as the official weekly podcast of Nintendo World Report, focused on current and classic Nintendo games.^[11] An archived podcast listing describes Radio Free Nintendo as founded in July 2006 and released weekly.^[12] Wired covered the podcast in 2007 and 2008 through posts by Chris Kohler.^[13][3]

The site's video presence is represented by Nintendo World Report TV, a YouTube channel featuring reviews, previews, technical impressions, discussions, and Nintendo-related event coverage.^[4] Nintendo-focused outlet Nintendo Everything has used Nintendo World Report video material in coverage of Nintendo platform releases.^[14]

• Nintendo Life
• Nintendo Power
• Video game journalism

Category:Internet properties established in 1999 Category:Nintendo Category:Video game journalism Category:Video game news websites