Draft:OxRecs Digital
Submission declined on 15 April 2026 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Dan arndt 13 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 12 October 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Theroadislong 22 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by Chaotic Enby 22 months ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
Comment: Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage in multiple verifiable secondary sources. Interviews with the label's founder (such as the article in Studio-Sound) are primary sources and not independent or reliable. Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: no references? Theroadislong (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
| OxRecs DIGITAL | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1985 |
| Founder | Bernard H. Martin |
| Status | Active |
| Genre | pipe organ, choral |
| Location | Oxford, England |
| Official website | www |
OxRecs Digital is a British record label founded in 1985 by Bernard Martin. The label specializes in location recordings of choirs and church organ, with a particular focus on Oxford and Cambridge colleges and other historic institutions.
Overview
OxRecs Digital was established to document performances of choirs and organs in their original acoustic settings. Its early releases focused on instruments and ensembles associated with the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge.[1]
In 1991 the label issued The Organs of Oxford, a two-volume recording surveying organs in Oxford. Contemporary reviews noted both the scope of the project and its technical execution.[2][3] The project was associated with fundraising efforts connected with the University of Oxford.[1]
Subsequent releases included The Organs of Cambridge, issued in the mid-1990s, which received coverage in specialist and alumni publications.[4][5] Other projects have included recordings of organs at Eton College and choral repertory associated with English collegiate traditions.
Recording approach
A characteristic feature of OxRecs productions is the use of on-site recording, intended to preserve the acoustics of the buildings and instruments concerned. This approach has been noted in contemporary commentary on the label’s projects.[6]
Repertoire and collaborations
The label has issued recordings featuring choirs such as the Choir of Magdalen College, Oxford and the Choir of King's College, Cambridge, as well as a range of British organists. Its catalogue includes both newly recorded material and historical archive recordings of choral performances.
Some releases have combined music with spoken text, for example Blitz Requiem, involving the poet Francis Warner. and the organist David Goode. Warner’s later writings also refer to OxRecs catalogue items in the context of recorded choral repertory.[7]
Reception
Recordings issued by OxRecs have been reviewed in a range of specialist and general publications, including Studio Sound, Oxford Today, and The Organ Club Journal.[2][8][3]
Later releases, including recordings of early English organ repertory, have also been discussed in periodicals such as Goldberg Early Music Magazine and Early Music Today.[9][10]
The label’s work has also been cited in studies of English choral performance and recording history.[11]
Selected discography
- The Organs of Oxford , OXCD-41
- The Organs of Cambridge , OXCD- 59
- The Organs of Eton College, OXCD-65/66
- Archive recordings from Magdalen College Choir, Oxford (1906–1960), OXCD-116/130
- Blitz Requiem, OXCD-124
- Anthem for Easter Day, OXCD-148
See also
References
- ^ a b Martin, Bernard (November 1993). "Description of project". Oxford – the Journal of the Oxford Society. XLV (2). Oxford University Press: 66. ISSN 0030-7645.
- ^ a b Mitchell, Julian (September 1991). "Organs of Oxford". Studio Sound. 33 (9). Spotlight Publications Ltd: 46. ISSN 0144-5944.
- ^ a b Macklin, H. F. (November 1991). "Oxford CDs". The Organ Club Journal: 105. ISSN 0306-0357.
- ^ Knighton, Tess (1995). "Music review". CAM: University of Cambridge Alumni Magazine: 33.
- ^ Macklin, H. F. (May 1996). "Cambridge CDs". The Organ Club Journal: 87. ISSN 0306-0357.
- ^ Little, Reg (March 1992). "Classical fugues". Limited Edition – the Magazine of Oxfordshire. The Oxford Times: 25.
- ^ Warner, Francis (2015). The Choir of King's College Cambridge – The Complete ARGO Recordings. Decca. pp. 69–71.
- ^ O'Gorman, Francis (1991). "Record review". Oxford Today. 4 (1). Blackwell Publishers: 25. ISSN 0954-1306.
- ^ Dubois, Pierre (December 2007). "Goldberg Early Music Magazine". Goldberg Ediciones S.L.: 90. ISSN 1699-9606.
- ^ Kitchen, John (April 2007). "EEOP review". Early Music Today. 15 (2). Rhinegold: 21. ISSN 1352-0059.
- ^ Day, Timothy (2018). I Saw Eternity the Other Night. Penguin Random House. ISBN 9780241352199.
External links
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.