Draft:PostDICOM
Submission declined on 14 July 2026 by Avgeekamfot (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 28 June 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information.This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by ChrysGalley 48 days ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
Comment: Making a few edits doesn't solve AI writing. Avgeekamfot (talk) 11:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I reached the view that this was AI assisted (or similar tool) wording before I read the history of the article. The phrases are exactly those used by assistive technology. This was not an entirely human produced draft in my view: The platform has been integrated into clinical research workflows for dataset curation and remote image review
- that is not how humans write. and it is using AI implied promotional terms such as "curation". Overall this is an attempt at promoting the product rather than being an encyclopedia entry. ChrysGalley (talk) 07:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
This article contains paid contributions. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (June 2026) |
PostDICOM is a cloud-based DICOM viewer and picture archiving and communication system, or PACS. A 2024 paper about web-based DICOM viewers included PostDICOM in a survey of viewer features. The same paper also included it in performance testing after image files had been uploaded. Other medical imaging papers have mentioned PostDICOM as the viewer used to open or assess image files.[1][2][3]
Overview
PostDICOM is used to view and manage DICOM image files through a web browser. The 2024 paper described PostDICOM as software for examining and handling DICOM files. It listed functions such as multiplanar reconstruction, measurement tools, annotation, patient data storage, and cloud PACS storage.[1]
Evaluation in DICOM viewer research
The paper Web-Based DICOM Viewers: A Survey and a Performance Classification included PostDICOM in a review of web-based DICOM viewers. The study compared viewers by access, interface features, 2D and 3D viewing, browser performance, and operating system performance.
The paper included 16 viewers, surveyed 12, and tested seven with online demos. PostDICOM met 20 of the 29 listed metrics. It was listed behind OHIF, MED3WEB, and MedDream. Upload time was not counted in the rendering measurements.[1]
Use in medical imaging studies
A 2021 paper in Insights into Imaging discussed DICOM and medical imaging data management. The paper mentioned PostDICOM when discussing DICOM-SEG and DICOM-SR data.[2]
PostDICOM was also mentioned in a paper about radiologic assessment after total elbow arthroplasty. In that paper, radiographs were uploaded to the DICOM viewer PostDICOM after identifiable patient information was removed. Observers then evaluated two sets of radiographs using the viewer.[3]
References
- ^ a b c "Web-Based DICOM Viewers: A Survey and a Performance Classification". Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine. Retrieved 12 July 2026.
- ^ a b "How does DICOM support big data management? Investigating its use in medical imaging community". Insights into Imaging. Retrieved 12 July 2026.
- ^ a b "Reliability of radiologic assessment following total elbow arthroplasty". Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. Retrieved 12 July 2026.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.