Submission declined on 17 June 2026 by Cabrils (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Cabrils 60 days ago. Last edited by Cabrils 60 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 4 March 2026 by SocDoneLeft (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Declined by SocDoneLeft 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 14 January 2026 by Pegnawl (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Pegnawl 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 December 2025 by Rambley (talk). This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. Declined by Rambley 8 months ago.

• Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does.
  As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. In short, "notability" requires reliable sources about the subject, rather than by the subject.
  Please note that many of the references would appear to be from sources that are NOT considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, press releases, X/Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc).
  Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a promotional advertorial (see WP:PROMO and WP:EXCESSDETAIL), which Wikipedia is not.
  The draft does not appear to show that the subject has any notability beyond the average coverage in trade publications for similar corporations (see WP:ROTM).
  Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. Please note that if you have not already done so, you must also declare your COI on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please see WP:COI and/or WP:PAID). Given the conflict, the review of the page needs to be handled with care, mindful of the higher bar set by pages produced in circumstances of conflict of interest. Such pages typically may read too much like a promotional CV or advertorial (see WP:PROMO), which Wikipedia is not; and/or contain prose that is not of a standard appropriate for an encyclopaedia (also see WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPV).
  Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page.
  Note that since the draft was previously declined, you made practically no amendments before resubmitting again. To avoid further disappointment, please do NOT resubmit the draft until substantive issues raised here have been addressed.
  It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.
  It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NCORP criteria #3, because XXXXX").
  Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page, including the name of the draft page, and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 06:19, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: The substantial number of paywalls make it too difficult for me to review. My concern is that there seems to be only one truly independent source that can demonstrate corporate depth, Hamburger Abendblatt and a lot of industry publications and industry databases. ChrysGalley (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: 1. WP:SOLUTION. Rewrite in WP:NPOV and resubmit. 2. LLM authorship. WP:AIBOLD and WP:LLMISMs abound. SocDoneLeft (talk) 18:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Coverage is not sufficiently about company; reviews, hirings, and deals are not applicable. WP:N Pegnawl (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. ~2025-37708-14 (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Serrala Group GmbH (stylized as Serrala) is a German financial technology company headquartered in Norderstedt, Germany.^[1][2] It operates offices in Europe, North America, and Asia.^[3][2] The company develops finance software for automating accounts payable^[4], accounts receivable^[5][6], payments,^[2] cash forecasting and treasury management processes.^[7][2]

Serrala was founded in 1984 as Hanse Orga GmbH by Hans Herbert Lindemann,^[8][2] and the business remained family-owned until 2016.^[9]

In 1985, the company introduced its first product, Moneta, which supported treasury, cash, and liquidity management. This was followed in 1994 by AutoBank, which automated general ledger, accounts payable, and accounts receivable postings.^[10]

In 1999, Hanse Orga developed the SAP Liquidity Planner and, in 2000, integrated Moneta and AutoBank into the SAP environment. During the late 2000s, the company expanded its SAP-embedded software offerings to cover treasury operations and bank connectivity.^[10]

Hanse Orga consolidated several of its finance-related software offerings into a unified product suite in the 2010s.^[11] The company also expanded into working capital management and updated its software portfolio to be compatible with SAP S/4HANA.^[12]

The founder's son, Sven Lindemann, became chief executive officer in 2012.^[13]

By 2016, the company had subsidiaries in France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States, Switzerland, Hong Kong, and Spain.^[3] That same year, Waterland Private Equity acquired a majority stake in the company, ^[9] and Hanse Orga acquired SOPLEX Consult. ^[14] Further acquisitions followed in 2017: Dolphin Enterprise Solutions, Tembit Software, and e5 Solutions Group.^[15]

Hanse Orga adopted the name Serrala Group GmbH in 2018.^[16][17] The same year, the company shifted its product focus from SAP-embedded to cloud-native software.^[17][18]

In 2020, the company acquired AcceptEasy,^[19] and in 2021 the investor Hg purchased most of Waterland's interest.^[20][21] The Lindemann family retains a minority shareholding alongside Waterland.^[22]

In 2022, Hartmut Wagner was appointed chief executive officer^[23], and in 2023 he was succeeded by former chief financial officer Axel Rebien.^[24]

In 2024, Serrala acquired Payference,^[25] followed by Cevinio in 2026.^[26]

Serrala's software addresses the accounts payable^[4], accounts receivable^[5][6], payments,^[2] cash forecasting and treasury management functions^[7][2] of the finance process. Its portfolio includes both SAP-embedded and cloud-native products,^[2] the latter offered under the name Alevate.^[27][28] Since 2024, Serrala has stated that it is incorporating artificial intelligence and machine learning into its software portfolio.^[29]

In 2025, the company introduced the Serrala Finance Platform, which combines its products within a single interface with options for integrations, managed services, and related add-ons.^[2] In 2026, Serrala announced the launch of AI agents within its platform. Examples include accounts payable agents that apply policy rules and route approvals and accounts receivable agents that identify, match, and allocate previously unmatched incoming payments.^[30]

• Robotic process automation
• Corporate finance
• Accounting software

Category:Financial technology companies Category:Companies based in Hamburg Category:Software companies of Germany Category:German companies established in 1984