Submission declined on 21 May 2026 by RangersRus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by RangersRus 2 months ago. Last edited by RangersRus 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Hzn-benic (talk) 08:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Veritise.dk is a European compliance and technology governance platform specializing in artificial intelligence (AI) risk management.^[1] The platform operates primarily within the Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) sector, offering tools designed to help organizations align their AI deployments with regulatory frameworks, most notably the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act).

Veritise.dk functions as an enterprise software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform and digital "Trust Center." It allows companies to inventory internal AI initiatives, evaluate algorithmic models, and generate audit-ready documentation to verify corporate transparency and compliance.

The platform's primary service offerings include:

• AI Risk Assessments: Quantifying and evaluating operational, bias, data-poisoning, and model-failure risks across an organization's AI portfolio.
• Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems against the European Union's risk classifications (Minimal, Limited, and High-Risk) and compliance timelines specified under the EU AI Act.
• Internal Controls & Governance: Setting up structured approval workflows, role-based access, and accountability structures across the lifecycle of active AI models.
• Audit Readiness: Creating centralized evidence repositories and activity logs to support post-market monitoring and independent regulatory compliance checks.