Submission declined on 15 May 2026 by UpTheOctave! (talk). This draft does not include any sources or inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. You should also use inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. You must place an inline citation directly after: quotations; any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious; any material about living people. Learn how to create inline citations in the: Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup. VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by UpTheOctave! 2 months ago. Last edited by MoonFlight1969 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: Functionally has no sources since the link is 404ing. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 14:52, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Yankee angle is a conceptual framework used in strategic analysis and media studies to describe the implicit alignment of narratives with American geopolitical interests. The term refers to the interpretive bias that emerges when international events are framed through U.S. cultural, political, or ideological lenses. It is not inherently pejorative but denotes a structural tendency in discourse formation. == Background == The concept originated in analytical discussions of post‑Cold War media coverage, where Western reporting often reflected underlying assumptions of American primacy. In academic contexts, the Yankee angle is examined as part of psychopolitical and information‑regime modeling, focusing on how symbolic aggression and rhetorical framing influence perception of escalation. == Usage == Analysts employ the term to identify patterns in news language, editorial tone, and selective emphasis that reinforce U.S. strategic narratives. It is also used in comparative media analysis to contrast Anglo‑American framing with continental or regional perspectives. == References == * Ivashchenko, Sergey E. (2024). "How Russian‑Language Media and Psychopolitics Inform Strategic Forecasting of Escalation." RealClearDefense. [1]

[2] [3]