This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Veterinary medicine This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine Technology This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Rebuilt following the decline. Summary of changes:

• Added twelve independent peer-reviewed sources, bringing the total to twenty. These include Fertility and Sterility (1995, 1999, 2007), Human Reproduction (2000), International Journal of Andrology (1998, 2002), Theriogenology (2001), Reproduction in Domestic Animals (2002, 2005), Reproductive Medicine and Biology (2004), Archives of Andrology (2005), Veterinární Medicína (2005), Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (2014), Andrologia (2019), Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction (2021), Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation (2024) and Medicine (2025), plus a systematic review in Translational Andrology and Urology (2021).
• Several of these are studies of the device itself rather than passing mentions, including Makler et al. (1999), "Evaluation of the SQA IIB: a new version of a sperm quality analyzer", and Iguer-Ouada and Verstegen (2001), "Validation of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA) for dog sperm analysis".
• Removed all manufacturer-sourced product detail (model SKUs, bundled software names, accessory listings, veterinary product tables). Manufacturer sources reduced from eleven to three, now supporting only quality-control procedure, a CLIA classification statement attributed to the manufacturer, and a release date corroborated by CAP Today.
• Restructured the article around the independent evaluation literature rather than the product range, and included negative findings where sources report them, notably Makler et al. (1999) and Xu et al. (2025).

I have a declared paid conflict of interest, disclosed on my user page. Any correction or trimming by uninvolved editors is welcome. MindOfDerby (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply