The following table gives the crystalline structure of the most thermodynamically stable form(s) for elements that are solid at standard temperature and pressure. Each element is shaded by a color representing its respective Bravais lattice, except that all orthorhombic lattices are grouped together.
Not solid at standard temperature and pressure or uncertain
Melting point and standard pressure
The following table gives the most stable crystalline structure of each element at its melting point at atmospheric pressure (H, He, N, O, F, Ne, Cl, Ar, Kr, Xe, and Rn are gases at STP; Br and Hg are liquids at STP.) Note that helium does not have a melting point at atmospheric pressure, but it adopts a magnesium-type hexagonal close-packed structure under high pressure.
Crystal structures of elements at their melting points at atmospheric pressure
The following table give predictions for the crystalline structure of elements 85–87, 100–113 and 118; all but radon[2] have not been produced in bulk. Most probably Cn and Fl would be liquids at STP (ignoring radioactive self-heating concerns). Calculations have difficulty replicating the experimentally known bcc structures of the stable alkali metals, and the same problem affects Fr;[3] nonetheless, it is probably also BCC.[4] The latest predictions for Fl could not distinguish between FCC and HCP structures, which were predicted to be close in energy.[5] No predictions are available for elements 115–117.
Predicted crystal structures of highly unstable elements
The following is a list of structure types which appear in the tables above. Regarding the number of atoms in the unit cell, structures in the rhombohedral lattice system have a rhombohedral primitive cell and have trigonal point symmetry but are also often also described in terms of an equivalent but nonprimitive hexagonal unit cell with three times the volume and three times the number of atoms.
Identical symmetry to the α-Pa type structure. Can be considered slightly distorted from an ideal Cu type face-centered cubic structure[18] which has .
in grey metallic form, each As atom has 3 neighbours in the same sheet at 251.7pm; 3 in adjacent sheet at 312.0 pm.[18] each Bi atom has 3 neighbours in the same sheet at 307.2 pm; 3 in adjacent sheet at 352.9 pm.[18] each Sb atom has 3 neighbours in the same sheet at 290.8pm; 3 in adjacent sheet at 335.5 pm.[18]
6 nearest neighbours at 234 K and 1 atm (it is liquid at room temperature and thus has no crystal structure at ambient conditions!)
Identical symmetry to the β-Po structure, distinguished based on details about the basis vectors of its unit cell. This structure can also be considered to be a distorted hcp lattice with the nearest neighbours in the same plane being approx 16% farther away [18]
Zn has 6 nearest neighbors in same plane: 6 in adjacent planes 14% farther away[18] Cd has 6 nearest neighbours in the same plane- 6 in adjacent planes 15% farther away[18]
If the unit cell axial ratio is exactly the structure would be a mathematical hexagonal close packed (HCP) structure. However, in real materials there are deviations from this in some metals where the unit cell is distorted in one direction but the structure still retains the hcp space group—remarkable all the elements have a ratio of lattice parameters c/a < 1.633 (best are Mg and Co and worst Be with c/a ~ 1.568). In others like Zn and Cd the deviations from the ideal change the symmetry of the structure and these have a lattice parameter ratio c/a > 1.85.
The Double hexagonal close packed (DHCP) structure. Similar to the ideal hcp structure, the perfect dhcp structure should have a lattice parameter ratio of In the real dhcp structures of 5 lanthanides (including β-Ce) variates between 1.596 (Pm) and 1.6128 (Nd). For the four known actinides dhcp lattices the corresponding number vary between 1.620 (Bk) and 1.625 (Cf).[20]
Closely related to the β-W structure, except with a diatomic oxygen molecule in place of each tungsten atom. The molecules can rotate in place, but the direction of rotation for some of the molecules is restricted.
The Body centered cubic structure (BCC). It is not a close packed structure. In this each metal atom is at the centre of a cube with 8 nearest neighbors, however the 6 atoms at the centres of the adjacent cubes are only approximately 15% further away so the coordination number can therefore be considered to be 14 when these are on one 4 fold axe structure becomes face-centred cubic (cubic close packed).
The face-centered cubic (cubic close packed) structure. More content relating to number of planes within structure and implications for glide/slide e.g. ductility.
The observed crystal structures of many metals can be described as a nearly mathematical close-packing of equal spheres. A simple model for both of these is to assume that the metal atoms are spherical and are packed together as closely as possible. In closest packing, every atom has 12 equidistant nearest neighbours, and therefore a coordination number of 12. If the close packed structures are considered as being built of layers of spheres, then the difference between hexagonal close packing and face-centred cubic is how each layer is positioned relative to others. The following types can be viewed as a regular buildup of close-packed layers:
Mg type (hexagonal close packing) has alternate layers positioned directly above/below each other: A,B,A,B,...
Cu type (face-centered cubic) has every third layer directly above/below each other: A,B,C,A,B,C,...
α-La type (double hexagonal close packing) has layers directly above/below each other, A,B,A,C,A,B,A,C,.... of period length 4 like an alternative mixture of fcc and hcp packing.[21]
α-Sm type has a period of 9 layers A,B,A,B,C,B,C,A,C,...[22]
Precisely speaking, the structures of many of the elements in the groups above are slightly distorted from the ideal closest packing. While they retain the lattice symmetry as the ideal structure, they often have nonideal c/a ratios for their unit cell. Less precisely speaking, there are also other elements are nearly close-packed but have distortions which have at least one broken symmetry with respect to the close-packed structure:
In type is slightly distorted from a cubic close packed structure
α-Pa type is distorted from a hexagonal close packed structure
^Koufos, Alexander P.; Papaconstantopoulos, Dimitrios A. (2013). "Electronic Structure of Francium". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 113 (17): 2070–2077. doi:10.1002/qua.24466.
^ abArblaster, John W. (2018). Selected Values of the Crystallographic Properties of Elements. ASM International. p. 608. ISBN978-1-62708-154-2.
^Florez, Edison; Smits, Odile R.; Mewes, Jan-Michael; Jerabek, Paul; Schwerdtfeger, Peter (2022). "From the gas phase to the solid state: The chemical bonding in the superheavy element flerovium". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 157. doi:10.1063/5.0097642.
^ abGrosse, A. V. (1965). "Some physical and chemical properties of element 118 (Eka-Em) and element 86 (Em)". Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry. 27 (3). Elsevier Science Ltd.: 509–19. doi:10.1016/0022-1902(65)80255-X.
^
Atarah, Samuel A.; Egblewogbe, Martin N. H.; Hagoss, Gebreyesus G. (2020). "First principle study of the structural and electronic properties of Nihonium". MRS Advances: 1–9. doi:10.1557/adv.2020.159.
^Harry L. Yakel, A REVIEW OF X-RAY DIFFRACTION STUDIES IN URANIUM ALLOYS. The Physical Metallurgy of Uranium Alloys Conference, Vail, Colorado, Feb. 1974
P.A. Sterne; A. Gonis; A.A. Borovoi, eds. (July 1996). "Actinides and the Environment". Proc. of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Actinides and the Environment. NATO ASI Series. Maleme, Crete, Greece: Kluver Academic Publishers. pp. 59–61. ISBN0-7923-4968-7.
L.R. Morss; Norman M. Edelstein; Jean Fuger, eds. (2007). The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN978-1402035555.