This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article sounds a lot like an advertising of the features of Fc. It needs to be rewritten with information from a NPOV. - I am adding this after reading terms in this article such as easy and rapid. Thanks--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 06:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've made a few changes to the article, making the language more neutral.ascorbic (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, the flow goes only one way. Once you start using Flash Builder, you can't go back to Flash Catalyst. Adobe should consider combining Flash Professional, Flash Builder and Flash Catalyst into a single product. That would eliminate the need to transfer projects from one program to the next. The only thing the user would need to do is set up the project view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.99.57 (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Will Adobe release a CS6 version? If not, what should users of CS5 move to?108.23.147.17 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC).Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe Flash Catalyst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090131212752/http://groups.adobe.com:80/groups/5753501d2b/summary to http://groups.adobe.com/groups/5753501d2b/summary

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply