This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

English Language Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books: Reference works This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

I just created this page. Tail end sections including 'notes' and 'see also' are not visible although they appear in the editable version. Please help!

I can't see anything in the editable version that isn't appearing on the page - are you sure you saved the page? the edit history shows only this edit. —Keakealani •Poke Me•contribs• 06:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK I worked out that the problem was with my hidden comment, which now appears as an ugly red thing Template: please check date. How the hell do I make invisible comments? Rimi 06:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

The problem was an incorect use of html comments as <!-- Please check --!> instead of the right way: <!-- Please check -->--Commander Keane 06:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It would be nice to have some words about other Advanced Learner's Dictionary than Oxford's. A comparison would be great! Not really able to help myself unfortunately. Calimo (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would like to have Advance Learner's Dictionary with DVD 8th Edition, the next new one. When will it launched? thank you

Gabi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.58.241 (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The new Collins COBUILD section appears to be 100% based on the content from "antimoon.com", without attribution. Phrases like "There were considerable differences between the 4th edition and the 3rd edition, but they don't matter anymore, because the only editions available are the 4th and 5th" don't belong on Wikipedia in my opinion. It also contains lots of statements like "The digital (CD-ROM) 6th edition was slower than the 5th and quite buggy", which would have to be supported by references if they belong on Wikipedia at all. Not sure what to do with this, short of completely rewriting or reverting it. Faixu (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply