This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wildfire Low‑importance Angora Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I had heard on local TV news that no commercial structures were damaged by the Angora Fire?  uriel8  (talk) 04:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would like to thank new member TheNins.com for uploading her fantastic images!--Amadscientist 10:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Most of my information is comming from KCRA Channel 3, in Sacramento. According to them the fire started at the Seneca Pond Recreation Area. Total of 275 structures lost as of June 28th. Time of fire start is recorded as 2:10...but that's splitting hairs.--Amadscientist 10:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

They may not stay up for more than a few weeks at best in most cases. Many news websites remove their stories after a short time. Btter to cite a news paper page or magazine article in current events or semi permanent published websites.--Amadscientist 21:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think it's been determined the fire was caused by an illegal campfire. We should change the infobox accordingly. Julian Maestas 17:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Although two local witnesses on site at the time of the fire say the U.S. Forest Service accidentally started the Angora fire. The Tahoe Mountain News reported the names of one of the witnesses, Ethan Niven. Robert Stiles who spoke to the boy one evening at the presentation of a flag he had created to commemorate the event verified his story. Why the cause of the fire was covered up is beyond me, said Stiles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.83.136.106 (talk) 17:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Is this fire still a current event? It's not in the news anymore, and even the article says the fire is expected to be fully controlled by July 10. It's past July 10. 75.63.18.59 01:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angora Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604025156/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/28/TAHOEFIRE.TMP to http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/28/TAHOEFIRE.TMP
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070810181813/http://www.sacbee.com:80/angorafire/ to http://www.sacbee.com/angorafire/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply