Talk:Aspect (computer programming)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Examples without Citation
Aspect-orientation is not limited to programming since it is useful to identify, analyse, trace and modularise concerns (e.g., PREview) through requirements elicitation, specification and design. Aspects can be multi-dimensional by allowing both functional and non-functional behaviour to cross cut any other concerns, instead of just mapping non-functional concerns to functional requirements.
What is PREview? Citing examples is useless if no futher information is given.
- Please sign your comments with ~~~~. Softtest123 14:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I created a link to PREview, though that doesn't solve the problem described (I am not the writer of the original comment above BTW). Mithunc (talk) 19:11, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories
It seems to me that deleting categories without discussion is not in compliance with Wikipedia Policy.
Softtest123 14:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I don't think Wikipedia policy forbids such edits, category itself is not removed, just the article removed from this category. For the reason of category removal, please see [1]: ...This category requires frequent maintenance to avoid becoming too large It should list very few (if any) article pages directly, and should mainly contain sub-categories. Articles in this category should be moved to subcategories where appropriate... The category "Aspect-oriented programming" is already a subcategory of "Software Engineering" (over others subcategories). Andreas Kaufmann 17:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ah. I got rushed away while I was editing this and didn't have time to research it properly. I would ordinarily cite the policy which would have found your reference. Thanks for the tip. Softtest123 13:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll remove Category:Software Engineering from this article.Softtest123 13:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
What?
Aspects can be multi-dimensional by allowing both functional and non-functional behaviour to cross cut any other concerns, instead of just mapping non-functional concerns to functional requirements.
The above appears to be non-sense. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 00:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Cross cut?
It is not clear what 'cross cut' means in this context. Apparently a metaphor, this has a variety of different meanings in the movie world, mining and carpentry. Can another more commonplace expression be found to explain what is meant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.137.88.130 (talk) 14:43, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Aspect vs. concern
What is the difference between aspect and concern? --Abdull (talk) 15:36, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.