This article was nominated for deletion on 6 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

I edited this article a bit but I don't like word invocation used in the article name (Asynchronous method invocation). The same name is used by Object Management Group and this Wikipedia article is referenced in one of their reports </ref>{{cite report|last=Willemsen|first=Johnny|title = Unified Component Model for Distributed, Real-Time and Embedded Systems RFP| url=http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?mars/2013-09-10}}</ref>. It would be more logical to use one of the other names listed in summary because this article is in category Software design patterns (Asynchronous pattern) but I found exact phrase only used for Microsoft .NET implementation. Gpeja (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Task-based Asynchronous Pattern is Microsoft .NET implementation and belongs to this article under TAP.Gpeja (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asynchronous method invocation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080105093534/http://www.zeroc.com:80/doc/Ice-3.2.1/manual/Async.34.2.html to http://www.zeroc.com/doc/Ice-3.2.1/manual/Async.34.2.html#71139
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask.html(v=vs.110).aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328070322/http://www.zeroc.com:80/doc/Ice-3.2.1/manual/Async.34.3.html to http://www.zeroc.com/doc/Ice-3.2.1/manual/Async.34.3.html#76161

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply