Talk:Attach rate

Neologism?

I get the distinct impression this is something that was made up on the fly, and isn't an actual existing business term. Ten pages of Google results seems to indicate the only place this is used is in videogame related articles (notably on discussions of the Wii, PlayStation 3 and the XBox 360). Surely if there's some actual business logic behind this, or rather, if this is an actual business term, at least one reliable and credible source can be provided that uses the term "attach rate". —Locke Coletc 22:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article in a trade magazine for the services and support industry talks about attach rate. I'd say that's a reliable source. In this article, the complementary product is the AppleCare protection plan, and the primary products are iPods and Apple computers. However, AppleInsider probably doesn't quite qualify as reliable. — Ksero (leave me a message, things I've done) 23:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Not quite what I was hoping for, but it's better than endless blogs talking about game consoles. I guess my thinking is, if this is a legitimate business term, then some academic reference should be possible to find (a business school, or a professor giving a lecture, or something of that nature). Or maybe there's a better or more widespread term than 'attach rate. —Locke Coletc 23:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'm actually surprised there is any controversy here; it is a relatively common term in Hollywood as well as in the video game business, but I guess outside of consoles it's not really in the press. Here are some links though:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/105-9864181-7382038?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=%22attach+rate%22
http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=%22attach+rate%22+pc+-Blu+-HD+-PS3+-Wii+-Xbox&go=Search&form=QBRE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petertorr (talkcontribs) 05:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Read Edge sometime, or a games industry site. Attach rate is not some made-up term, jesus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.72.177 (talk) 00:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spelling

Corrected some spellings. "Complementary" is correct. "Complementery" is a misspelling. Note that "complimentary" is an entirely different word having an entirely different meaning.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.