This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wildfire High‑importance August Complex fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Weather: Droughts / Wildfires Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Droughts and wildfires task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I noticed that this page lists the size of the fire 491k acres using this source: [1]. However, the List of California wildfires page lists the fire at 747k acres using this source: [2]. I don't know which is more accurate so I'm not making any changes. Just noting it here for others.»NMajdan·talk 19:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think there may be some confusion in the incident management, or at least among the updaters for the website. However, since the fires have techically merged and been combined into one larger complex, we should treat the fire as a single entity. As of this morning, it appears that InciWeb designates the Doe Fire as the "August Complex South Zone" and the Elkhorn Fire as the "August Complex North Zone". But it seems that they still acknowledge that the fires have merged, given the statements on the incident pages and the designations of "August Complex" for each fire. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. I may have been responsible for that discrepancy on the Wikipedia side as I was frantically trying to follow the updates this morning. At this point it definitely makes more sense to have both in the same article. Shannon [ Talk ] 00:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Is that so? I seem to find that it's 726k acres...^[1]69.194.59.207 (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit: source was outdated

I think the table should be narrowed as it's running way off the screen at least on my computer (both Safari and Firefox). Anyone else having the same issue? Shannon [ Talk ] 21:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not having any issues on a 1920 X 1080 screen (standard HD ratio), which I specifically designed dimensions of the table for. Given the prevalence of this ratio and its status as the current, "default" HD standard, I think that the tables should be tailored for the 1920 X 1080. But naturally, we can't accommodate every possible setting, so the table will naturally look like it is running off screens with narrower aspect ratios (especially on smartphones). I believe that if I were to use my older laptop (which has a 1366 X 768 screen), the table would run off the edge of the screen. Conversely, the table will appear to look narrower on larger desktop screens with wider aspect ratios. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Given that Wikipedia recommends images be no wider than 400px since some people might be using something like a smart phone and most people don't set their browser window to full screen even if they have a larger display, I would suggest something considerably narrower than the current table, say 500px at most. Perhaps recast as different type of chart or drop the graphics and just have the percent containment number. --Erp (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I used a wikipedia calculating template https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Calculation to get the table size under control (told it to take the previous numbers and divide by 2, if the file gets much bigger increase the denominator). --Erp (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just guessing here but the 755k acre figure from the latest update is possibly a typo, and meant to be 855k. We'll know for sure tomorrow. Shannon [ Talk ] 01:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Is the fire about 850k acres? I looked it up and that's what I found. 69.194.59.207 (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

All the other fires I have seen all have the word "Fire" capitalized in the title, but not this one, the biggest fire in California History. Is there any way to change it?

ANormalWikiEditor (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)Reply