Talk:BlogTV

Notability

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Of the sources cited, which ones you think prove the notability? I think no one satisfies WP:GNG requirements, but I may be mistaken. Loew Galitz (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Loew Galitz, I just realized I never clicked save on changes I made last night. Oops. In my defense, I was half-conscience at that hour. I came back to this article today and, thinking I had added more than a single citation, removed the banner. I will re-add the citations momentarily, but I believe that [1][2][3][4] and to a lesser extent [5] are enough to satisfy GNG. HouseBlastertalk 00:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.