Talk:Blue Cut Fire

Note on the name

There has been some back and forth in the media regarding the name of the fire... Some are calling it Bluecut Fire while others are calling it Blue Cut Fire. The USFS (the official Incident Command agency) has dubbed it Bluecut Fire so that is what we will be going with. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yep, and that's what shows up on Inciweb, so good enough for me. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
@NorthBySouthBaranof: my thoughts exactly. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The fire is named after the trail, the trail is called Blue Cut. [[[1]]]]

@Tatarize: I left a message on your talk page but I want to leave the same message here for others to see... PLEASE NOTE: I'm not saying that you are wrong! In fact, I believe that you are correct... But this is 100% original research which is not allowed. If and when a news article or other source mentions at least what the fire is named after, then this can be added. Simply citing Google maps is original research. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
@NorthBySouthBaranof: so things just got weird.... The first paragraph of InciWeb is now calling it the Blue Cut Fire... I'm going to go ahead and rename the article. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
👍 Fuzheado likes this.
That is because it is named after the Blue Cut road. Separating the word Blue and Cut is the correct spelling. Source: [2]Juneau Mike (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.