Talk:Body kit

Merged

Merged from Body kits. SilkTork 20:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Removed comment

I removed the comment about "Peugeot were perhaps the first to bring the factory bodykit back to the fore in 1997". I briefly worked at Ford in 1995/1996, and we had reams of promotional material on our (hideous) RS bodykits for the then-new Ford Mondeo. Not that I'm giving Ford the credit, mind you... -- DeLarge 15:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Advantages?

"Many advantages to body kits include better aerodynamics as well as having a high degree of aesthetic value" Huh? Many body kits give more drag and are ugly as my knob. I've removed my knob. // Liftarn

A lot of tuning companies also add body kits to help with aerodynamics. Examples being Ruf, Gemballa, Brabus, Novitec and Overfinch. Redstoneprime (talk) 08:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

this page sucks

and the discussion page is even worse. somebody please rectify — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.56.5.180 (talkcontribs)

just for looks?

is there any benefit to these or do they just make the car look sportier? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.66.237 (talk) 22:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Some bodykits (not all, mind you) actually help to improve a cars aerodynamics. It's the reason why upgraded cars from the likes of Brabus, Ruf or Novitec often look sportier than your standard Mercedes, Porsche, Ferrari, McLaren or Lamborghini (for example). Redstoneprime (talk) 08:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

More references

Right now, the only reference is from an opinion blog site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagquattro2009 (talkcontribs) 17:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.