Talk:Code of silence

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tega.odjegba. Peer reviewers: Kaixunzhong.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A potentially good source to use

Please see this. Spidern 15:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This entry and Conspiracy of silence (expression)

Both entries use several of the same examples; the distinction between the two entries is subtle and not seemingly all that important. Merge? Hairhorn (talk) 16:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Edits

One think I would like to add to this page is the connection between the code of silence and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Just like the Fifth Amendment, people are allowed to say(or not say) certain things that may incriminate them or the person that is being accused. I want to talk about numerous examples of how the code of silence has been seen in today's society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tega.odjegba (talkcontribs) 21:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed

This is too specific to sit here for years with no citation.

The code of silence was famously practiced in Irish-American neighborhoods in Boston, Massachusetts such as Charlestown, South Boston, and Somerville.[citation needed]

With citation or not at all. — MaxEnt 23:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Revised lead

Before this edit, the first two paragraphs of this article read:

"A code of silence is a condition in effect when a person opts to withhold what is believed to be vital or important information voluntarily or involuntarily."
"The code of silence is usually followed because of threat of force or danger to oneself, or being branded as a traitor or an outcast within the unit or organization, as the experience of police whistleblower Frank Serpico illustrates. Police are known to have a well-developed blue wall of silence."

I think this original lead is a more succinct summary of the topic than the more wordy lead that was left after the edit as it seems to have a subtly different meaning, too. Rather than revert the edit out of hand I have tried to fix the Manual of Style issues with the article. However, I don't feel I have been entirely successful and think it might take a lot more effort to address all the issues this edit has introduced. I am not sure if the ISBN numbers for the citations are correct, some are plainly wrong and the two cited sources for Serpico are inconsistent as they refer to different editions by different publishers with incorrect ISBN's. This makes me suspicious that the whole edit might be AI generated, but I cannot confirm that. If anyone else has any ideas of how to address these concerns feel free to contribute, and edit the article. Returning to the former state of the article is also an option, but I think the changes made are somewhat of an improvement, perhaps. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rollback of AI-generated rewrite

User:Knowledgeisk3y4 replaced the article with completely new text today saying I edited and updated the entire page. Please verify as per the additions and citations to make it a trusted source.

Having checked some of these citations, the article text appears to have been partly or entirely WP:LLM generated. None of the ISBNs are valid, some of the sources (eg. https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2010/07/25/code-of-silence-corrodes-morality-puts-blacks-at-risk/) are 404 pages, and the edit included navbox templates that don't exist.

I've reverted it. Belbury (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.