Talk:Commercial intelligence

Proposed merge of Competitive intelligence with Commercial intelligence

These articles seem to discuss an extremely similar subject matter. In fact they both mention the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals. TheDragonFire (talk) 08:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 15:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed unmerge

I believe that the merge last year of Competitive intelligence and Commercial intelligence was completed with little discussion and was misguided. Competitive intelligence is a specific and relatively focussed field in which practitioners utilise legal and ethical methods to assess what their competitors are doing and planning, and taking appropriate steps to adapt to this intelligence. Commercial intelligence is a wider task in which practitioners assess the commercial environment in which they and their business or agency operate. See, for example, the brief note about commercial intelligence in a procurement and supply context at https://www.cips.org/intelligence-hub/procurement/big-data-in-procurement#item-block-4 and the UK Government's recruitment advertisement (2024) for a practitioner in the commercial intelligence field at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-needs-and-sourcing/commercial-intelligence-commercial-practitioner. Since governments do not operate in a competitive environment, the latter item is a good example of why we should not treat competitive intelligence and commercial intelligence as the same concepts. I do not suggest that TheDragonFire and Klbrain did not act in good faith in undertaking this merge, but my proposal would be to unmerge these two articles again. I note that Lmadureira completed an edit in September last year making a similar point. BobKilcoyne (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

More than 7 months on and with substantial edits in the interim, reversing a merge doesn't seem feasible. However, you can alway start a WP:SPLIT proposal. To say that governments aren't competitive is surprising - have you listened to 'today in parliament'? Klbrain (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I seem to recall this was not particularly clear from the articles themselves, but I will absolutely yield to an informed opinion. If you are in a position to do so, one or both of the articles are in need of significant cleanup. TheDragonFire (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.