Talk:Common Designer

It's unclear to me from reading this new article whether common designer is any different than intelligent designer. I believe this distinction should be made clear in the article, or the article should be merged with intelligent designer. Keep in mind that Wikipedia also supports redirections, so maybe the original author would like to go that route. Jonemerson 09:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

A Google search for "common designer" (with quotes) returns only one result related to creationism. Therefore without a cited explanation of how this term differes from Intelligent Designer, I recommend deletion of this article with perhaps a REDIRECT added for Intelligent designer. Jonemerson 01:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.