Talk:Defensive three-second violation

I created this page and redirected the previous article named "illegal defense" here, because the actual name of the violation in the NBA Rule Book is "Defensive Three-Second Violation" instead of illegal defense. AllPurposeGamer (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Help:move, you should always use the "move" tab to move pages, rather than do a copy/paste pagemove. --Rividian (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, use the move function. I've fixed the cut-and-paste move so that the history is now together. However, I think the capitalization may be wrong. Unless this is a proper name, I think it may have to go to Defensive three-second violation. Consult WP:MOS and move as appropriate. Happy editing! Cool Hand Luke 04:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

As far as I can tell, the NBA has it fully capitalized on the first website provided as a reference, and in their official rules book it is capitalized as well. AllPurposeGamer (talk) 12:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Illegal defense in the '90s?

This page gives two rules in different eras termed "illegal defense" in the NBA: the defensive three-second violation (since 2001), and zone defense (prior to 1983). There was an illegal defense rule in the NBA in the 1990s, though. E.g., the Bulls are called for one in Game 1 of the 1996 Conference Finals against the Magic. What was that rule? --Delirium (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quote attributed to Michael Jordan

I'm not a great writer, but I thought there was a minor edit. This sentence:

Jordan is quoted as saying, "If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did."

It's written as if Michael Jordan spoke the phrase, but its actually a reference to the writer quoting Jordan in third person. The writer at the Trib is even paraphrasing Jordan there. It's just weird seeing a quote talking about Jordan's career in the third person attributed to the man himself.

Again, not the best writer, but I edited the source in a way that I think makes more sense. Tmaffia (talk) 05:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.