This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Industrial design Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-2017, the GCSE for design and technology (also known as D&T) expected students to design and make an item of their choice. On completion the teacher of the student is expected to mark the project and award points for the finish of the final product, the creativeness of it, the complexity of it and how well the project itself was made. 40% of the students overall grade depends on the practical work and a further 20% on the coursework. The final 40% of GCSE is based on an examination of the students general knowledge of the subject. However, if a student is injured whilst in the process of making their practical work the teacher of the student can apply to the exam board to have either an extension of time or the teacher can apply to give the student an estimated mark.

• 1. Design Brief
• 2 Task Analysis
• 3. Function
• 4. Market Research
• 5. Specifications
• 6. New Order Specification (in order of importance)
• 7. Ideas (10 ideas)
• 8. Evaluation Of Ideas
• 9. Development Of Idea (including construction points, e.g., joints)
• 10. Plan Of Manufacture
• 11. Progress Diary
• 12. Evaluation Of Product

Not encyclopedic in my view. Inner Earth 11:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

1.Image board
2.Definition
3.General Analysis
4.Problem Situations
5.Design Brief
6.Further Analysis
7.Design Specification
8.Exploration of Ideas
9.Detailed Development
10.Manufacturing Plan

Hove 12:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I propose we merge Design_technology into this article's IBDT section. -Wizzard2k 22:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

• Support. The title alone justifies merging. Design technology cannot stand on its own and can easily be incorporated into IBDT. --Liveste 05:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge completed. There are no double-redirects, but a few links that should be changed. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 17:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply