Talk:Design rationale
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Style
This looks like a lit review assignment for a university class. It's got lots of bits of information but isn't organized clearly. -- Jlg4104 20 November 2008, 12:35.
There is a sentence that ends as a fragment. Can be found by searching for the word "becomese", which I can only assume is a typo on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apclapp (talk • contribs) 22:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Done Thanks; I corrected the sentence fragment reported above. This was apparent vandalism in revision 578396376 by 112.198.82.23 (talk) several years ago. Biogeographist (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Art vs. engineering
Design rationale is also used in actual "art-school design". This article is about engineers rationalizing their design. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.84.247 (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Horst Rittel, a pioneer of design rationale, wrote:
Everybody designs sometimes; nobody designs always. Design is not the monopoly of those who call themselves "designers". From a downtown development scheme to an electronic circuit, from a tax law to a marketing strategy, from a plan for one's career to a shopping list for next Sunday's dinner, all of these are products of the activity called design. The scope of entities designed is vast and the knowledge employed in design is very diverse, ranging through all aspects of human experience. Only if there is some specific commonality between these activities in spite of the great diversity of the objects they deal with, it is justifiable to talk about design in general terms. I contend that there are such characteristic commonalities which demarcate design from other forms of coping with difficulties.
— Horst Rittel, "The reasoning of designers", Arbeitspapier A-88-4, Stuttgart: Institut für Grundlagen der Planung, Universität Stuttgart, 1987/1988 OCLC 75157251
- Rittel's words imply that design rationale as discussed in this article applies just as well to "art-school design" as it does to engineering, urban planning, and even vernacular design. Biogeographist (talk) 18:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.