Talk:Dirac string
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2010) |
 | The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a full view of the subject. (September 2010) |
Electric charge
Does Dirac string scatter electric charge? (or electron) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.241.187 (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- The Dirac string should be viewed as the line limit of the field of a solenoid. the only nontrivial scattering would come from deflection caused by interference from going around different sides of the solenoid, from the Aharanov Bohm effect. The dirac quantization condition guarantees that this interference phase is the same as in empty space. So the Dirac string doesn't scatter charges--- it is invisible. This is why you can take the limit of infinitesimal solenoid without anything blowing up.Likebox (talk) 10:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Dirac String Observed?
[BBC News article] reporting the discovery of a magnetic monopole refers to the observation of a Dirac String (and in fact references this page). If this is correct then perhaps the bit about it being a "fictional" construct could be removed? Sawatts (talk) 07:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, and in any case "fictitious" is entirely the wrong word in a scientific context to describe a hypothetical phenomenon. (Suspect ornate of the word arose from author not being able to think of the correct word or not understanding the meaning of the chosen word). Word changed to hypothetical.
- Refarding BBC news story, it references the original article in Nature - http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v505/n7485/full/nature12954.html
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.