Talk:Discursive dominance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Discursive dominance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
A dominant discourse is a winning discursive formation. It is the one that survives the widest range of criticisms in various forums and media.
By "winning" and "survives" is it meant that the dominant discourses survive and win in the sense of that they go on to "reproduce" and continue to stay dominant??
Could the author explain what is meant and the language used? It is a little confusing. --Maskani123 (talk) 05:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
The plural of discourse
The second sentence: "Ultimately, one of the discourse emerges as dominant" looks as though it ought to say "discourses", plural. I shall pluck up my courage and change it, but I'm wrong, I look forward to an explanation. Nick Barnett (talk) 19:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.