Talk:Dual norm

good sources

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

hi guys,

trying to improve this section but having trouble finding good sources. Rudin's functional analysis (chapter 4) isn't bad, but it's more about Banach spaces and dual spaces.

it's possible one could "cobble together" a definition from Rudin's discussion, but i find it lacking. i tried finding a copy of Pavel Aleksandrov's combinatorial topology (volume three seems really really nifty), to no avail.

wondering if anyone here has some good recommendations for books touching on functional analysis and duality? @Zfeinst: (never thought i'd see this day, did you? lollll): got any good recommendations?

any advice would be great. right now this section is poorly sourced, and if i wasn't familiar with the concept (i learned them through Fenchel conjugates), i would have put a request for deletion (exaggerating, sorta).

174.3.155.181 (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A first source that I have open in front of me right now is "Infinite Dimensional Analysis" by Aliprantis and Border (3rd Ed., Section 6.3: p. 230-232). Once I get to my office I might be able to give more references, as I'll have more books to glance at. Also I agree that this page needs a lot of improvement. Would not have even thought to look here if it weren't for you @174.3.155.181:. I'd like to think we can have a difference of opinion on some topics while still having respect and discourse. Zfeinst (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Zfeinst: thanks man. i'll check it out soon and hopefully i can bounce around from there using any references in the back of the book. if you want to make some edits you can go ahead. thanks again man. 174.3.155.181 (talk) 17:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.