Talk:Electron diffraction
 | Electron diffraction has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 20, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
 | Electron diffraction was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 26, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Reversion of content on early Soviet interference experiments.
@WalterPogosov, while this paragraph is probably true, it's inclusion here is a not appropriate:
- It has been included out of chronological order, the work of Bethe etc is earlier.
- The paragraph contains statements such as "lesser known" which while true are opinions not backed by a source so WP:OR and not allowed.
- It is out of context. It is included in a section on the Scroedinger equation and early proof of dynamical diffraction and the connection to quantum mechanics, not wave interference.
- it is off-topic. From the description provided the right location for the paragraph is in a different article Matter wave#Experimental confirmation.
N.B., was there no translation of the work? It would help to include that when adding it to Matter wave. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.