Talk:Element OS
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Element OS article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
This is currently a small page about a linux distrobution that will be expanded in the next few days. Any linux distrobution should have it's own wiki page so that people who are wondering what a distobution is, they can look it up. 83.109.119.242 (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Notability
The article has been tagged for notability. I would contend that the first ref cited already established that, although more third party refs could be added. - Ahunt (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- This distro has been pretty well covered in the media, so it is easy to find refs for it. I have added three more and will remove the notability tag. - Ahunt (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- You don't seem to be using "the media" in the usual sense. References link to a blog and some Linux distribution website I had never heard about. In its current form, the article still leaves doubts about the subject's notability. --Chealer (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- It has two highly reliable sources, DistroWatch and Linux Today, plus two lesser ones. DistroWatch is reliable enough by itself to establish notability for Linux distros. How many do you want? - Ahunt (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- The tag is not about reliability, it is about notability. --Chealer (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sigh - reliable sources establish notability as per WP:N, which says: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.". - Ahunt (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Since it has been a week with no further discussion of this topic I will remove the tag. - Ahunt (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sigh - reliable sources establish notability as per WP:N, which says: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.". - Ahunt (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- The tag is not about reliability, it is about notability. --Chealer (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- It has two highly reliable sources, DistroWatch and Linux Today, plus two lesser ones. DistroWatch is reliable enough by itself to establish notability for Linux distros. How many do you want? - Ahunt (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- You don't seem to be using "the media" in the usual sense. References link to a blog and some Linux distribution website I had never heard about. In its current form, the article still leaves doubts about the subject's notability. --Chealer (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Element OS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121121042717/http://www.elementmypc.com/main/index.php to http://www.elementmypc.com/main/index.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329055112/http://www.ghabuntu.com:80/2010/02/element-os-your-ultimate-entertainment.html to http://www.ghabuntu.com/2010/02/element-os-your-ultimate-entertainment.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121121042717/http://www.elementmypc.com/main/index.php to http://www.elementmypc.com/main/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121121042717/http://www.elementmypc.com/main/index.php to http://www.elementmypc.com/main/index.php This link was bad link, it's redirect to affiliate ad, please verify it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nammaket (talk • contribs)
, it is still a good archive link. - Ahunt (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.