Talk:Emirate of Multan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emirate of Multan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss
@Sutyarashi, you can discuss your concerns here. You reverted perfectly sourced edits. PadFoot (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not a single of your edits was sourced – please obtain a consensus for your changes per WP:ONUS. Sutyarashi (talk) 05:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sourced? Perhaps you don't know what the Indian subcontinent is? PadFoot (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- You need to read WP:SOURCE and WP:ONUS. Sutyarashi (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- I've already read those. WP:RS states that sources are not required for obvious stuff. Also those categories that you want were added without consensus too. PadFoot (talk) 06:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- You need to read WP:SOURCE and WP:ONUS. Sutyarashi (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sourced? Perhaps you don't know what the Indian subcontinent is? PadFoot (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Lodi/Lawi
@Noorullah21 the Brill source makes the statement based on Ferishta, specifically this is the source it cites: Firishta, Muhammad Kasim Ghulam, Ta’rikh-i Firishta or Gulshan-i Ibrahimi, Bombay 1917, Eng. tr. J. Briggs, Calcutta 1910.
Other sources make it clear, e.g see Ferishta tells that he was an Afghan chieftain and belonged to the Lodi family. This statement has been questioned by many scholars like Raverty, Hodivala, Nāzim, Sayyid Sulaiman Nadvi and others.
[1] See also op of other scholars e.g Firishta’s Lodi (or Afghan) is an obvious error for Lawi.
[2] and Ferishta has erroneously written Lodi and the error has been repeated by Sir W. Haig.
[3]
See also MacLean, Derryl N. (2023). "Ismailism in Arab Sind". Religion and Society in Arab Sind. Brill. p. 135. doi:10.1163/9789004669291_006. ISBN 978-90-04-66929-1. Abu al-Fath Lodi, the nisbah (Lodi) surely a copyist's error for Lu'ayy.
Sutyarashi (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- ^ Ahmad Nabi Khan (1974). "Multan During the Rule of the Arabs and the Ismailis". In Ahmad Hasan Dani; Waheed-uz-Zaman (eds.). Proceedings of the First Congress of Pakistan History & Culture Held at the University of Islamabad, April 1973: Addresses and proceedings and papers. University of Islamabad Press. pp. 288–289.
- ^ Yogendra Mishra (1972). The Hindu Sahis of Afghanistan and the Punjab, A.D. 865–1026: A Phase of Islamic Advance Into India. Vaishali Bhavan. pp. 100–101.
- ^ Nijjar, Bakhshish Singh (1968). Panjāb Under The Sultāns 1000–1526. Delhi: Sterling Publishers. p. 16. OCLC 251656510.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.