Talk:End run

(protocol violation)

Some clarification on the Star Trek quote would be appreciated, as out of context it makes little sense. 166.66.39.90 (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

   Having run across the term in the context of a ship that we credit with an end run on the way to Inchon in S. Korea early in the K'n war, i linked that article (USS Hornet, or one of the destroyers accompanying her in her beauty shot), to the accompanying article. Someone w/ a stronger interest can decdide whether to add coverage of the chain-of-command-violation (preceding talk sec'n) and the surprise-attack senses, or make a jump raise to disabiguation.
--Jerzyt 04:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.