Talk:Enumerator (computer science)

The formal definition is not in Sipser (2012)

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have Sipser (2012) (the only reference) in front of me. He only defines enumerators informally (as a special kind of Turing machines), and leaves the formal definition as an (uncorrected) exercise, so I've marked the "formal definition" section as unreferenced. Anyway, the subsection of Sipser (2012) related to enumerators is literally one page long (enumerators are only mentioned to show that many equivalent versions of Turing machines exist). Surely there is a better reference. Pripensanto (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Formal Definition issue

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

is not defined NoamB (talk) 02:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.