This article was nominated for deletion on 16 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Regular expression.

This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disambiguation This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation

For the past 10 years this had been a redirect to Regular expression, obviously not a satisfactory state of affairs. I've tried to improve it by creating a disambiguation page, though I'm not sure that what we're dealing with is strictly speaking an ambiguous term rather than the name for a group of very closely related topics. Would it be better to pick the most general article on the topic, expand it with relevant content and then retarget there? I don't know. If the dab page stays, then maybe someone could have a look in case it makes any incorrect statements?

Also, I found out after the fact that there was a related recent discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8#Find and Replace. Maybe those who took part (@Feminist, MB, Graeme Bartlett, Jay, Mdewman6, Shhhnotsoloud, Mx. Granger, Certes, Mdewman6, Tamzin, Rosguill, Bonoahx, and Pppery:) may be willing to weigh in here? – Uanfala (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think I suggested the retarget back because there were only two alternatives I could find, which could quite easily fit into two hatnotes. If you've found more then I think changing to a dab page is a good idea. Bonoahx (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Possibly we could have a broad-concept article about "find and replace" or "find" functions in general. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Actually I think Mx. G has it right. What we have here is the skeleton of an article. It could be expanded a little; categorised as an article; Find and Replace (audio drama) put in a hatnote; and Find and Replace redirected here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

For this (with lower case) I agree that a dab page or mini article is more appropriate than a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply