Talk:Gate array

OK, I did the merge from ULA, but this article still needs some cleanup from someone familiar with the chips, who can also talk like regular people. :>) There is still a bit much jargon that is not quite comprehensible to someone outside of chip design and fab. Thanks!Lisamh 03:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Might be useful to cite and quote from New Scientist, for example https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bvrsJuPd6SUC&pg=PA478 which introduces TI as a supplier, or the sample material from Chris Smith's book: http://www.zxdesign.info/book/bookAnnounce.shtml or Michael Debenham's book: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4LsgBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA51 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.217.39 (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I don't want to seem officious or anything, but upon reviewing this page, a lot of content was apparently added by Robert Lipp who is himself referenced to an extent in this article. I thought that this generally wasn't a done thing on Wikipedia. Also, a lot of the content doesn't really have the level of citing that seems to be required these days, and I think the article's structure might need some review as well. --PaulBoddie (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just browsing and saw your comment about my edits as a primary source. I always thought primary sources were preferred over secondary sources. You would prefer me to have quoted hearsay rather than facts? That’s what most references actually are. ~2026-22670-89 (talk) 20:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Robert Lipp ~2026-22670-89 (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.