This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: North America / United States Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force

The first two sentences do not parse well or at all. There is a "than" but no descriptor (i.e. "more", "less") so it doesn't seem to make sense, but I lack the appropriate legalese to correct it as I don't understand exactly what it's trying to say. Anyone? Hamiltondaniel (talk) 22:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The summary of my edit to the accompanying article ended up reflecting only the problem of a colleague apparently mistaking something like "general article offense" as indicating that "general article" is a term referring to an offense. Researching, after establishing w/in WP that the g.a. is part of the UCMJ, not something it prohibits, i learned (as i suspected) that the concept and perhaps wording within Art. 134 were inherited from British mil law, and unexpectedly found that the precise term "general article" is a generic term also so inherited. I didn't try to add the needed sections on its evolution there, but i did put in a few sentences, and redo my lead sent accordingly.
--Jerzy•t 22:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Effect on the charged.

Social out comes on the charged.

Use by state agents on the charged.

Social outcome of having socially charged the volume of persons charged.

Systemic structure of the use of the charge.

Article insufficient for encyclopaedic need as of: Fifelfoo (talk) 11:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply