Talk:Generative design
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Adding sources
Hello - I will add sources after the article about Georg Nees has been completed--Maxim Pouska (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Suggested edits
The last sentence is misleading and needs improving or deleting. Generative art/architecture does not necessarily require feedback loops. Indeed, dataflow programming (as with Rhino Grasshopper) does not in general include cycles. Also the quotes need to be properly referenced. 82.12.206.4 (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
this text is adverising blabla by Autodesk - please delete it
this Text: "Generative design is a technology that mimics nature’s evolutionary approach ..."
Latest revision as of 03:11, 3 July 2016 (edit) (undo)
183.193.113.168 (talk) That is advertising language.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Strongly agreed, and it got even worse! the Fusion 360 advertising has no source! 2804:7F0:B1C1:D1EC:C6A8:3957:CDD9:3C20 (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Capitalisation of article name
Generative Design → Generative design? Bookwormgirl910 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
"Algorithmic design" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Algorithmic design. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Queen Elizabeth II Great Court not generative design
The form-finding of the Queen Elizabeth II Great Court do not fit my understanding of the presented definition of generative design as the applied form-finding approach by Chris Williams only generates one solution, not several. Sehlstrom (talk) 08:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible AI-generated content
Hi - I added the AI generated tag here. While this is only a suspicion, not proof, edits like this and this contain enough indicators of possible LLM use that they should be carefully reviewed -- ideally by a subject-matter expert -- for accuracy, hallucinatios, AI editorializing, etc. Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.