This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[List of political parties in India#State|State Party]] The anchor (#State) has been deleted by other users before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

I have edited the article to make it more up-to-date. Since the 2017 Goa Assembly election are over with the results declared and the Government formed with Goa Forward as a member of the party, the following sections appear too elaborate and unnecessary:

• 2017 results
• Post alliance impact
• Alliance plans with Congress

I have included the journey from Goa Forward's possible alliance to the formation of a government with the BJP, in a composite section called '2017 Assembly elections'. I have added a section called 'Government formation' to highlight what Ministries and Corporations the Goa Forward MLAs and supporters have been allotted.

As far as the section "Other issues" is concerned, the subsections except "Party promises" seem irrelevant and too elaborate as of date. I am including the "Party promises" subsection in the "Manifesto and agenda in 2017 elections" section.

Kindly let me now if there is any query or grievance about my edits, we could discuss it on the talk page.

Thank you for editing the article. I think you have managed to sweep under the carpet some inconvenient facts about this political party, and hence do a whitewash job (if not resort to censorship). I would request readers to check up the history of this article and see the "irrelevant and too elaborate as of date" matters which have been swept aside. fredericknoronha (talk) 19:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Fredrick Noronha! Thank you for the feedback. Please be assured that there was no attempt to whitewash or succumb to any censorship. You are free to make any changes in this article in necessary. The last edit by you was before the results of the 2017 elections. I have added some part of your details and re arranged the article in various sections and sub sections. However, please do feel free to make the changes if any.

Regards

The excuse that the "sections appear too elaborate and unnecessary" and hence need to be trimmed doesn't make sense and isn't justified in my view. This is just another way of getting inconvenient facts out of the way and, in a word, censorship. I would urge Wikipedia editors to look at this content and trend. fredericknoronha (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply