This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong U2 (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject U2, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.U2Wikipedia:WikiProject U2Template:WikiProject U2U2

I've long tried to figure out just what this song is getting at. Is it written from the POV of John Lennon, pointing out some contradictions and hypocricy in the process? Or is it written from Bono's POV? Or is it something else entirely?

--208.204.155.241 22:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Steve Stockman in Walk On: The Spiritual Journey Of U2 gives a pretty good account of Bono's reason for the song.

Bono felt that Lennon had got the love concept half right in "All You Need Is Love". He felt that Lennon had left
God out of the discussion to a degree. So the title "God Part 2" puts God back into the discussion, includes the
love concept in the chorus (e.g. "I believe in love")and opens up the concept of "God as love", a reference to
1 John 4 in the New Testament. 
        I think the song also creates contrasts between the ideal man and the real man while at the same time
criticizing modern culture with its excesses and its fantasies. He takes a shot at Goldman, a biographer who
wrote harsh biographies on Lennon and Elvis but also critiques revenge at the same time. He includes Cockburn,
"kicking the darkness til it bleeds daylight", another evangelical who is strong on social justice issues.
The song ends with a final reference to the presence of God.   - Kit Hill, Ed. D. LMFT  
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.109.209.78 (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply 

The image Image:U2r&h.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• File:U2r&h.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply