This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Google To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here. Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback Maintain : This WikiProject Merge : Google Mobile Services into List of Google products Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products Other : Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...) create: Help the Google article for a good article status Improve the Outline of Google Get more members using : {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}} Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology Computing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

It looks like the Project Soli section has been hijacked into a resume for "Engineer Rubayet Hossain (Omi)"? It should clearly be removed but a reference to him as part of the Project Soli team should probably stay. Baconaetor (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Actually I see no reference to him in either of the referenced articles, and a quick Google search doesn't return any results about him being CTO. As such I'll just remove the whole section. Baconaetor (talk) 18:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Such apparent attempts at (self-?)promotion of Hossain seems to be a recurring issue. Cybercobra (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The iteration of nonsense which OP complained about was added August 25, 2022. An informal, manual search by myself didn't encounter any earlier edits attempting to add this false, self-promotional vandalism. An edit on 2023-May-17 tried yet again to re-vandalize the article. Perhaps WP:PC should be requested if this continues. We keep playing whack-a-mole with IP accounts which haven't engaged in any discussion of these edits thus far. Cybercobra (talk) 06:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The vandal is still at it. Cybercobra (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The bogus citation used in these edits (A) Is instead for an individual named Kazi Saabique Ahmed; and (B) By a book author whose sheer number of recently-published (likely non-print?) books suggests they're unlikely to be a reliable source on such a wide array of technology topics. I suspect "Fouad Sabry" is a corporate pen-name used to publish content taken from elsewhere. Cybercobra (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Same bogus info was added again on 27 August 2023. Cybercobra (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Made a succcessful request for Pending Changes protection. Cybercobra (talk) 03:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Although there hasn't been an announcement, it seems that ATAP has been shutdown:

• Between 2023-06-19 and 2023-07-23, their YouTube profile picture was deleted.
• Between 2023-09-27 and 2023-11-28, the website https://atap.google.com changed to 301 redirect to Google Search
• The last blog post was in July 2023
• The author of that post and other former employees left Google in March 2024 during the layoffs.
• The former heads of engineering and design, along with a few other lead engineers, left a year prior to start Archetype AI, shortly before public activity from ATAP ceased.

All of this is circumstantial, so I'm wondering if there's a better way to mention it in the article. Racer C77 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

You might try tipping off a news outlet, who might be able to ask Google directly. If they then publish a story, we'd have a reliable secondary source to cite. A sentence mentioning the 301 redirect sounds appropriate regardless. Cybercobra (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply