This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think I should write something down before a speedy deletion comes around. I just stumbled into this article and never had anything to do with it, but I should say -- keep it and expand it. It's bordering non-notability, but it's linked from other generational issues articles and it's a fascinating concept in and of itself. Makes me want to go back to graduate school and write a thesis on it. Dnavarro (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

• This page is currently in orphan status, due to not being linked to any related articles.
• Implications that fall under the first criteria of a good article include, inconsistency with wording (eg. Generation Xers, Gen-Xers), its comprised on only four sentences, and only provides one with a general definition.
• In order to meet the second criteria there would need to be more than one source as a reference and include in-text citations.
• The third criteria would be met if more subsections were added explaining in which jobs this most frequently occurs in, the effects of the gray ceiling on younger generations, and possible solutions addressing the topic.
• The information provided would meet the fourth criteria because it takes a neutral stance on the gray ceiling phenomenon.
• The fifth criteria is met in the fact that the article topic and information given is not being disputed by editors. There are no images to illustrate the topic to viewers and therefore does not meet the criteria for a good article.

Xwoodbx (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply